Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377791›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2015

PPREMO: a prospective cohort study of preterm infant brain structure and function to predict neurodevelopmental outcome.

Joanne M George, Roslyn N Boyd, Paul B Colditz, Stephen E Rose, Kerstin Pannek, Jurgen Fripp, Barbara E Lingwood, Melissa M Lai, Annice H T Kong, Robert S Ware and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reliability Study of the Items of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) Using Kappa Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne M GeorgeQueensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. j.george2@uq.edu.au.
Roslyn N BoydQueensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. r.boyd@uq.edu.au.
Paul B ColditzUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. p.colditz@uq.edu.au.
Stephen E RoseDigital Productivity Flagship, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia. Stephen.rose@csiro.au.
Kerstin PannekQueensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. k.pannek@imperial.ac.uk.
Jurgen FrippDigital Productivity Flagship, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia. Jurgen.Fripp@csiro.au.
Barbara E LingwoodUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. b.lingwood@uq.edu.au.
Melissa M LaiUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Melissa.lai@uq.edu.au.
Annice H T KongUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. a.kong1@uq.edu.au.
Robert S WareSchool of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. r.ware@sph.uq.edu.au.
Alan CoulthardRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. a.coulthard@uq.edu.au.
Christine M FinnQueensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Christine.finn@uq.edu.au.
Sasaka E BandaranayakeQueensland Paediatric Rehabilitation Service, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. sasaka.bandaranayake@health.qld.gov.au.
University of Queensland · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUQueensland Children’s Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 50 percent of all infants born very preterm will experience significant motor and cognitive impairment. Provision of early intervention is dependent upon accurate, early identification of infants at risk of adverse outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging at term equivalent age combined with General Movements assessment at 12 weeks corrected age is currently the most accurate method for early prediction of cerebral palsy at 12 months corrected age. To date no studies have compared the use of earlier magnetic resonance imaging combined with neuromotor and neurobehavioural assessments (at 30 weeks postmenstrual age) to predict later motor and neurodevelopmental outcomes including cerebral palsy (at 12-24 months corrected age). This study aims to investigate i) the relationship between earlier brain imaging and neuromotor/neurobehavioural assessments at 30 and 40 weeks postmenstrual age, and ii) their ability to predict motor and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 and 12 months corrected age. METHODS/

designThis prospective cohort study will recruit 80 preterm infants born ≤ 30 week's gestation and a reference group of 20 healthy term born infants from the Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Infants will undergo brain magnetic resonance imaging at approximately 30 and 40 weeks postmenstrual age to develop our understanding of very early brain structure at 30 weeks and maturation that occurs between 30 and 40 weeks postmenstrual age. A combination of neurological (Hammersmith Neonatal Neurologic Examination), neuromotor (General Movements, Test of Infant Motor Performance), neurobehavioural (NICU Network Neurobehavioural Scale, Premie-Neuro) and visual assessments will be performed at 30 and 40 weeks postmenstrual age to improve our understanding of the relationship between brain structure and function. These data will be compared to motor assessments at 12 weeks corrected age and motor and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 months corrected age (neurological assessment by paediatrician, Bayley scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Alberta Infant Motor Scale, Neurosensory Motor Developmental Assessment) to differentiate atypical development (including cerebral palsy and/or motor delay). DISCUSSION: Earlier identification of those very preterm infants at risk of adverse neurodevelopmental and motor outcomes provides an additional period for intervention to optimise outcomes.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000280707. Registered 8 March 2013.

Indexed as

BrainCerebral PalsyDevelopmental DisabilitiesElectroencephalographyGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurologic ExaminationProspective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26377791
PMCPMC4572671
OpenAlexW2149960564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.