Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377581›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2015

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: a consensus statement developed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

A Amato, C Bottini, P De Nardi, P Giamundo, A Lauretta, A Realis Luc, G Tegon, R J Nicholls, Italian society of colorectal surgery

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Acute supralevator abscess: the little we know.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Treatment of anal fistula with FiLaCTechniques in coloproctology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A AmatoDepartment of Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Hospital of Sanremo, Via Borea, 56, Sanremo, IM, Italy. ab.amato@libero.it.
C BottiniDeparment of Surgery, Hospital S. Antonio Abate, Gallarate, VA, Italy.
P De NardiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
P GiamundoDeparment of General Surgery, Hospital Santo Spirito, Bra, CN, Italy.
A LaurettaDepartment General Surgery, Hospital Santa Maria dei Battuti, San Vito al Tagliamento, PD, Italy.
A Realis LucColoproctology Unit, Hospital S. Rita, Vercelli, Italy.
G TegonProctology Unit, Hospital S. Camillo, Treviso, Italy.
R J NichollsEmeritus Consultant Surgeon, St Mark's Hospital, London, England, UK.
Italian society of colorectal surgery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic fistula formation. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. The key to successful treatment is the eradication of the primary track. As surgery may lead to a disturbance of continence, several sphincter-preserving techniques have been developed. This consensus statement examines the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Indexed as

ConsensusAbscessAnal CanalAnus DiseasesColorectal SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDisease ManagementHumansItalyRectal FistulaSepsisAdvancement flapFibrin glueFistula-in-anoHorseshoe extensionLIFTPerianal abscessPlugSetonTranssphincteric fistulaVAAFT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.