Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377529›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2015

The Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer in Older Women With Adjuvant Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis of Data From Over 3000 Patients From the PATH Biobank, With Two-Year Follow-up.

Elke Peters, Tobias Anzeneder, Christian Jackisch, Thomas Dimpfl, Georg Kunz, Alexander Katalinic, Annika Waldmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  13. Age-Linked Treatment Rates.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  14. Lower Breast Cancer Mortality in Patients Aged 70+ Achievable.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elke PetersInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University Medical Center, Lübeck, PATH Biobank, Augsburg, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Kassel, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Institute for Cancer Epidemiology e.V., University of Lübeck.
Tobias Anzeneder
Christian Jackisch
Thomas Dimpfl
Georg Kunz
Alexander Katalinic
Annika Waldmann
University of Lübeck · DEUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer in women in Germany. Mortality from breast cancer has declined over the past 15 years, but less so in women aged 70 or older than in younger women. The discrepancy might be explained by age-related differences in treatment.

methodsData from the Patients' Tumor Bank of Hope (PATH) database of women who underwent adjuvant treatment for the treatment of an invasive primary tumor without distant metastases (year of diagnosis, 2006-2011) were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and tumor-biological findings and treatment data over two years of follow-up were compared across three age groups (under age 50, ages 50 to 69, and ages 70 and up). Chi-square tests were carried out to reveal significant differences, and post-hoc multiple comparisons were performed with and without Bonferroni correction. Treatment data were adjusted for staging and grading and tested for age-dependence with logistic regression.

resultsFollow-up data were available for 3257 (65% ) of 4981 women, of whom 61% were in the middle age group and 22% in the oldest. Compared to women aged 50 to 69, those aged 70 and up less commonly received breast-conserving treatment (68.8% vs. 86.4% ), chemotherapy (27.5% vs. 44.1% ), radiotherapy (81.8% vs. 92.4% ), and trastuzumab (52.9% vs. 79.3% ; p<0.001 for all differences). All differences remained significant after stastistical adjustment.

conclusionThe cause of these age-related differences is unclear. It cannot be determined from these data whether concomitant disease, the older patients' individual decisions, or other factors were responsible for their not receiving treatment as often as the younger patients did.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrevalenceAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26377529
PMCPMC4577665
OpenAlexW2414612656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.