ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016
Design and Validation of a Research-Grade Waterpipe Equipped With Puff Topography Analyzer.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of graphic warning label on acute changes in waterpipe tobacco smoking behavior, biomarkers of exposure and harm, and subjective effects in a randomized trial.Addictive behaviors · 2026Trial
- Chemical Constituents and Particle Size Distribution of Mainstream Emission From Electronic Waterpipe.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- Detection of the Synthetic Coolant Menthone 1,2-Glycerol Ketal in an e-Liquid and in Electronic Waterpipe Aerosols Therefrom.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023Article
- Possible Harmful Effects of Smoking Hookah on Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index and Protamine Genes Expression in Normozoospermic Men.Substance abuse : research and treatment · 2023Article
- Levels of Chemical Toxicants in Waterpipe Tobacco and Waterpipe Charcoal Solid Waste.Journal of environmental protection · 2021Article
- Comparative Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity of Cigarette, Cigarillo, and Shisha Tobacco Products in Epithelial and Cardiac Cells.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021Article
- Aquatic toxicity of waterpipe wastewater chemicals.Environmental research · 2021Article
- Waterpipe tobacco smoke toxicity: the impact of waterpipe size.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Effect of electric heating and ice added to the bowl on mainstream waterpipe semivolatile furan and other toxicant yields.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Evidence of compensation among waterpipe smokers using harm reduction components.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Testing of a commercial waterpipe electric heater and a research-grade waterpipe electric heater.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2020Article
- Variability in Puff Topography and Exhaled CO in Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking.Tobacco regulatory science · 2016Article
- Clinical Laboratory Evaluation of Electronic Cigarettes/Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Methodological Challenges.Tobacco regulatory science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWorldwide, commercially available waterpipes vary widely in design and durability, including differences in fabrication materials, degree of leak-tight fit, and flow path diameter. Little is known about how the components of the waterpipe may influence puffing behavior and user's exposure to toxins. To systematically evaluate exposure, it is necessary to use a standardized research-grade waterpipe (RWP) when conducting clinical and laboratory-based trials.
methodsWe developed a RWP that is configured with an in-line topography system which allows real-time measurement and recording of the smoke volume drawn through the RWP. The RWP was calibrated across the flow rate range expected for waterpipe tobacco smoking and the calibration was verified for known puff volumes using a smoking machine. Operation of the RWP was qualified in a cohort of experienced waterpipe smokers, each smoker using the RWP ad libitum in a laboratory setting while smoker topography and subjective effects data were collected.
resultsRWP machine smoking was highly reproducible and yielded puff volumes that agreed well with true values. User acceptance was comparable, and puffing behavior was similar in pattern, with more frequent puffing in the beginning of the session, but significantly different in intensity from that used to estimate the majority of toxicant exposure reported in the literature.
conclusionsThe RWP operates with known precision and accuracy and is well accepted by experienced smokers. This tool can be used to determine the extent to which puffing behaviors are affected by the waterpipe design, components, and/or accessories, tobacco nicotine content, sweet flavorings and/or additives known to increase addictiveness. IMPLICATIONS: This study describes a standardized RWP, equipped with a puffing topography analyzer, which can operate with known precision and accuracy, and is well-accepted by experienced smokers in terms of satisfaction and reward. The RWP is an important tool for determining if puffing behaviors, and thus estimated toxin exposures, are affected by the waterpipe design, components, and/or accessories, tobacco nicotine content, sweet flavorings, and/or additives that are known to increase addictiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.