ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2015
Sex-linked genomic variation and its relationship to avian plumage dichromatism and sexual selection.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not All Roads Lead to Red: The Genetics of Sexual Dichromatism in the Northern Cardinal (Cardinals cardinalis).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Opinion: Why Sex-Based Genomic Differentiation Should Not Be Overlooked in Population Genetics.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Role-reversed polyandry is associated with faster fast-Z in shorebirds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Domestication affects sex-biased gene expression evolution in the duck.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Sex in the city: sexual selection and urban colonization in passerines.Biology letters · 2019Article
- Postcopulatory sexual selection reduces Z-linked genetic variation and might contribute to the large Z effect in passerine birds.Heredity · 2019Article
- Sexual selection predicts the rate and direction of colour divergence in a large avian radiation.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Evaluating genomic signatures of "the large X-effect" during complex speciation.Molecular ecology · 2018Review
- Genetic Diversity on the Sex Chromosomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Review
- The Relative Contributions of theGenetics · 2017Article
- Colour ornamentation in the blue tit: quantitative genetic (co)variances across sexes.Heredity · 2017Article
- Determinants of genetic diversity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexual dichromatism is the tendency for sexes to differ in color pattern and represents a striking form of within-species morphological variation. Conspicuous intersexual differences in avian plumage are generally thought to result from Darwinian sexual selection, to the extent that dichromatism is often treated as a surrogate for the intensity of sexual selection in phylogenetic comparative studies. Intense sexual selection is predicted to leave a footprint on genetic evolution by reducing the relative genetic diversity on sex chromosome to that on the autosomes.
resultsIn this study, we test the association between plumage dichromatism and sex-linked genetic diversity using eight species pairs with contrasting levels of dichromatism. We estimated Z-linked and autosomal genetic diversity for these non-model avian species using restriction-site associated (RAD) loci that covered ~3 % of the genome. We find that monochromatic birds consistently have reduced sex-linked genomic variation relative to phylogenetically-paired dichromatic species and this pattern is robust to mutational biases.
conclusionsOur results are consistent with several interpretations. If present-day sexual selection is stronger in dichromatic birds, our results suggest that its impact on sex-linked genomic variation is offset by other processes that lead to proportionately lower Z-linked variation in monochromatic species. We discuss possible factors that may contribute to this discrepancy between phenotypes and genomic variation. Conversely, it is possible that present-day sexual selection -- as measured by the variance in male reproductive success -- is stronger in the set of monochromatic taxa we have examined, potentially reflecting the importance of song, behavior and other non-plumage associated traits as targets of sexual selection. This counterintuitive finding suggests that the relationship between genomic variation and sexual selection is complex and highlights the need for a more comprehensive survey of genomic variation in avian taxa that vary markedly in social and genetic mating systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.