Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377357›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2016

Finding the Optimal Conditioning Regimen for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison of BEAM and High-Dose ICE.

Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz, Sinem Civriz Bozdağ, Ali Kaya, Ayşegül Tetik, Ömür Kayıkçı, Gamze Durgun, Şerife Kocubaba, Fevzi Altuntaş

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Conditioning Regimens for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: BEAM Versus High Dose ICE.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Onur Esbah
Emre Tekgündüz
Itır Şirinoğlu DemirizAnkara Oncology Hospital, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Ankara, Turkey, Phone : +90 0532 296 89 98, E-mail: dritir@hotmail.com.
Sinem Civriz Bozdağ
Ali Kaya
Ayşegül Tetik
Ömür Kayıkçı
Gamze Durgun
Şerife Kocubaba
Fevzi Altuntaş
Memorial Ankara Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is a well-defined treatment modality for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Although there are several options in terms of conditioning regimens before AHCT, no one treatment is accepted as a standard of care. This study aimed to compare different conditioning regimens for the treatment of NHL and HL. MATERIALS AND

methodsMedical records of 62 patients who had undergone AHCT following BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and high-dose ICE (hICE; ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) conditioning regimens were analyzed retrospectively and compared in terms of efficacy and adverse effects.

resultsThe study included a total of 29 and 33 patients diagnosed with relapsed/refractory NHL and HL, respectively. Patients received BEAM (n=37) or hICE (n=25) regimens for conditioning. One-year overall survival was 73±6% in all patients. One-year overall survival was 71±8% and 74±9% in the BEAM and hICE groups, respectively (p=0.86). The incidences of nausea/vomiting (grade ≥2) (84% vs. 44.7%; p=0.04) and mucositis (grade ≥2) (13% vs. 3%; p=0.002) were higher in the hICE group compared to the BEAM group. In addition, we witnessed significantly more hepatotoxicity of grade ≥2 (40% vs. 2.7%; p<0.005) and nephrotoxicity of grade ≥2 (48% vs. 2.7%; p<0.005) among patients who received hICE. Significantly more patients (n=4; 25%) in the hICE group experienced veno-occlusive disease (VOD) compared to the BEAM arm, where no patients developed VOD (p=0.01).

conclusionThere was no difference in terms of overall survival between the BEAM and hICE groups. We observed significantly more adverse effects among patients treated with hICE. The BEAM regimen seems to be superior to hICE in terms of toxicity profile with comparable efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL and HL.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCytarabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugEtoposideFemaleHodgkin DiseaseHumansIfosfamideLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMelphalanCarboplatinCytarabineEtoposideIfosfamideMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID26377357
PMCPMC5111466
OpenAlexW2407583432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.