Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377316›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

The association of health literacy with adherence in older adults, and its role in interventions: a systematic meta-review.

Bas Geboers, Julii S Brainard, Yoon K Loke, Carel J M Jansen, Charlotte Salter, Sijmen A Reijneveld, Andrea F de Winter, Andrea F deWinter

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bas GeboersDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, FA10, PO Box 196, , 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. b.j.m.geboers@umcg.nl.
Julii S BrainardNorwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. j.brainard@uea.ac.uk.
Yoon K LokeNorwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. y.loke@uea.ac.uk.
Carel J M JansenDepartment of Communication and Information Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.j.m.jansen@rug.nl.
Charlotte SalterNorwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. c.salter@uea.ac.uk.
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, FA10, PO Box 196, , 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. s.a.reijneveld@umcg.nl.
Andrea F de WinterDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, FA10, PO Box 196, , 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.f.de.winter@umcg.nl.
Andrea F deWinter
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1207-15244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow health literacy is a common problem among older adults. It is often suggested to be associated with poor adherence. This suggested association implies a need for effective adherence interventions in low health literate people. However, previous reviews show mixed results on the association between low health literacy and poor adherence. A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews was conducted to study the association between health literacy and adherence in adults above the age of 50. Evidence for the effectiveness of adherence interventions among adults in this age group with low health literacy was also explored.

methodsEight electronic databases (MEDLINE, ERIC, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, DARE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge) were searched using a variety of keywords regarding health literacy and adherence. Additionally, references of identified articles were checked. Systematic reviews were included if they assessed the association between health literacy and adherence or evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to improve adherence in older adults with low health literacy. The AMSTAR tool was used to assess the quality of the included reviews. The selection procedure, data-extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Seventeen reviews were selected for inclusion.

resultsReviews varied widely in quality. Both reviews of high and low quality found only weak or mixed associations between health literacy and adherence among older adults. Reviews report on seven studies that assess the effectiveness of adherence interventions among low health literate older adults. The results suggest that some adherence interventions are effective for this group. The interventions described in the reviews focused mainly on education and on lowering the health literacy demands of adherence instructions. No conclusions could be drawn about which type of intervention could be most beneficial for this population.

conclusionsEvidence on the association between health literacy and adherence in older adults is relatively weak. Adherence interventions are potentially effective for the vulnerable population of older adults with low levels of health literacy, but the evidence on this topic is limited. Further research is needed on the association between health literacy and general health behavior, and on the effectiveness of interventions.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth LiteracyPatient ComplianceAgedFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID26377316
PMCPMC4573285
OpenAlexW2124650989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.