Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377229›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2015

Sleep spindles and human cortical nociception: a surface and intracerebral electrophysiological study.

Léa Claude, Florian Chouchou, Germán Prados, Maïté Castro, Barbara De Blay, Caroline Perchet, Luis García-Larrea, Stéphanie Mazza, Hélène Bastuji

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intracortical Functional Connectivity Predicts Arousal to Noxious Stimuli during Sleep in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. A mechanism for learning with sleep spindles.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Léa ClaudeCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Florian ChouchouCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Germán PradosCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Maïté CastroCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Barbara De BlayCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Caroline PerchetCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Luis García-LarreaCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Stéphanie MazzaUniversité Lumière Lyon 2, Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC), Bron, France.
Hélène BastujiCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France.
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRLaboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsSleep spindle are usually considered to play a major role in inhibiting sensory inputs. Using nociceptive stimuli in humans, we tested the effect of spindles on behavioural, autonomic and cortical responses in two experiments using surface and intracerebral electroencephalographic recordings. We found that sleep spindles do not prevent arousal reactions to nociceptive stimuli and that autonomic reactivity to nociceptive inputs is not modulated by spindle activity. Moreover, neither the surface sensory, nor the insular evoked responses were modulated by the spindle, as detected at the surface or within the thalamus. The present study comprises the first investigation of the effect of spindles on nociceptive information processing and the results obtained challenge the classical inhibitory effect of spindles. ABSTRACT: Responsiveness to environmental stimuli declines during sleep, and sleep spindles are often considered to play a major role in inhibiting sensory inputs. In the present study, we tested the effect of spindles on behavioural, autonomic and cortical responses to pain, in two experiments assessing surface and intracerebral responses to thermo-nociceptive laser stimuli during the all-night N2 sleep stage. The percentage of arousals remained unchanged as a result of the presence of spindles. Neither cortical nociceptive responses, nor autonomic cardiovascular reactivity were depressed when elicited within a spindle. These results could be replicated in human intracerebral recordings, where sleep spindle activity in the posterior thalamus failed to depress the thalamocortical nociceptive transmission, as measured by sensory responses within the posterior insula. Hence, the assumed inhibitory effect of spindles on sensory inputs may not apply to the nociceptive system, possibly as a result of the specificity of spinothalamic pathways and the crucial role of nociceptive information for homeostasis. Intriguingly, a late scalp response commonly considered to reflect high-order stimulus processing (the 'P3' potential) was significantly enhanced during spindling, suggesting a possible spindle-driven facilitation, rather than attenuation, of cortical nociception.

Indexed as

Laser-Evoked PotentialsAdultArousalCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMaleNeural InhibitionNociceptionSleep, REMThalamus

Identifiers

PMID26377229
PMCPMC4650416
OpenAlexW2151654262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.