ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2015
Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFRI) for ventilator-associated pneumonia diagnosis by cytokine multiplex analysis.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02078999 (Observational Study in Patients Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit.Tracheal Bacterial Load Surveillance in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation - Assessment of Biomarkers in the Distinction Between Colonization and Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational Study in Patients Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit.Tracheal Bacterial Load Surveillance in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation - Assessment of Biomarkers in the Distinction Between Colonization and Infection
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- ClusterVAP: study protocol for multicentre proteomic endotyping of ventilator-associated pneumonia.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Alveolar dysregulation of host response in pneumonia and ARDS: implications for immune modulation and infection.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Biomarkers in pulmonary infections: a clinical approach.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Early molecular markers of ventilator-associated pneumonia in bronchoalveolar lavage in preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2023Article
- Host-pathogen interaction during mechanical ventilation: systemic or compartmentalized response?Critical care (London, England) · 2019Review
- Biomarkers in Pneumonia-Beyond Procalcitonin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor for the prediction of ventilator-associated pneumonia.ERJ open research · 2019Article
- Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2018Article
- Integrative research agenda for diagnosis in sepsis.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Article
- BreathDx - molecular analysis of exhaled breath as a diagnostic test for ventilator-associated pneumonia: protocol for a European multicentre observational study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2017Observational
- Focus on infection and sepsis in intensive care patients.Intensive care medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is challenging. An important aspect to improve outcome is early recognition of VAP and the initiation of the appropriate empirical treatment. We hypothesized that biological markers in plasma can rule out VAP at the moment of clinical suspicion and could rule in VAP before the diagnosis can be made clinically.
methodsIn this prospective study, patients with VAP (n = 24, microbiology confirmed) were compared to controls (n = 19) with a similar duration of mechanical ventilation. Blood samples from the day of VAP diagnosis and 1 and 3 days before were analyzed with a multiplex array for markers of inflammation, coagulation, and apoptosis. The best biomarker combination was selected and the diagnostic accuracy was given by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC).
resultsTNF-receptor 1 (TNFRI) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) were selected as optimal biomarkers at the day of VAP diagnosis, which resulted in a ROC-AUC of 0.96, with excellent sensitivity. Three days before the diagnosis TNFRI and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels in plasma predicted VAP with a ROC-AUC of 0.79. The slope of IL-10 and PAI-1 resulted in a ROC-AUC of 0.77. These biomarkers improved the classification of the clinical pulmonary infection score when combined.
conclusionsConcentration of TNFRI and PAI-1 and the slope of PAI-1 and IL-10 may be used to predict the development of VAP as early as 3 days before the diagnosis made clinically. TNFRI and GCSF may be used to exclude VAP at the moment of clinical suspicion. Especially TNFRI seems to be a promising marker for the prediction and diagnosis of VAP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.