Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377089›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2015

Why the Central Dogma: on the nature of the great biological exclusion principle.

Eugene V Koonin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Generalizing the central dogma as a cross-hierarchical principle of biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. The computational power of the human brain.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  5. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Global Organization and Proposed Megataxonomy of the Virus World.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Physical foundations of biological complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eugene V KooninNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Instittues of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA. koonin@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Funding

Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Central Dogma of molecular biology posits that transfer of information from proteins back to nucleic acids does not occur in biological systems. I argue that the impossibility of reverse translation is indeed a major, physical exclusion principle that emerges due to the transition from the digital information carriers, nucleic acids, to analog information carriers, proteins, which involves irreversible suppression of the digital information.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisMolecular BiologyNucleic AcidsProteinsNucleic AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26377089
PMCPMC4573691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.