Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377051›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2015

Self-reported use of novel psychoactive substances in a US nationally representative survey: Prevalence, correlates, and a call for new survey methods to prevent underreporting.

Joseph J Palamar, Silvia S Martins, Mark K Su, Danielle C Ompad

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Kratom Use Is Underestimated, but Prevalence Still Appears to Be Low.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph J PalamarNew York University Langone Medical Center, Department of Population Health, New York, NY, USA; Center for Drug Use and HIV Research, New York University College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA; Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, and Prevention Studies, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: joseph.palamar@nyumc.org.
Silvia S MartinsColumbia University, Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Mark K SuNew York University School of Medicine, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, New York, NY, USA.
Danielle C OmpadCenter for Drug Use and HIV Research, New York University College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA; Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, and Prevention Studies, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University, Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI LINDA M COLLINS · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
Predictors of Pathological Gambling among African-American Young AdultsR01HD060072 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CANINO, GLORISA J, DUARTE, CRISTIANE S. · 2009 to 2018
$3.9M
State medical marijuana laws and NSDUH marijuana use and consequences since 2004R01DA037866 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARTINS, SILVIA SABOIA · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Trending: Social media analysis to monitor cannabis and synthetic cannabinoid useR01DA039454 · NIDA · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DANIULAITYTE, RAMINTA, SHETH, AMIT P · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
Development of a Rapid Survey to Detect Use of New and Emerging DrugsK01DA038800 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PALAMAR, JOSEPH J · 2015 to 2019
$879k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060072NICHD NIH HHS R01HD060072NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA038800NIDA NIH HHS K01DA-038800NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041NIDA NIH HHS P30DA011041NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037866NIDA NIH HHS R01DA037866NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039454NIDA NIH HHS R01DA039454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, there has been an increase in emergence and use of novel psychoactive substances (NPS) in the US and worldwide. However, there is little published epidemiological survey data estimating the prevalence of use in the US.

methodData on self-reported NPS use came from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health (2009-2013), a national representative sample of non-institutionalized individuals in the US. Subjects were asked to provide names of (non-traditional) drugs they used that they were not specifically asked about. We examined lifetime prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of self-reported use of new and uncommon synthetic drugs (NPS) among subjects ages 12-34-years-old.

results1.2% of subjects self-reported any use of the 57 NPS we examined. Use of psychedelic tryptamines (primarily DMT) was most common, followed by psychedelic phenethylamines (e.g., 2C series) and synthetic cannabinoids. Prevalence of self-reported use of NPS increased from 2009 to 2013 and use was most common among males, whites, older subjects, those of lower income, and among those residing in cities. Lifetime use of various other illicit drugs (e.g., LSD, cocaine, ecstasy/MDMA) was highly prevalent among NPS users.

conclusionThis the first study reporting on use of a variety of NPS in a nationally representative US sample; however, use appears to be underreported as other national data suggest higher rates of NPS (e.g., synthetic cannabinoid) use. Developing more adaptable survey tools and systematically assessing NPS use would allow researchers to ask about hundreds of NPS and improve reporting as new drugs continue to rapidly emerge.

Indexed as

HallucinogensIllicit DrugsPsychotropic DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAlkaloidsCannabinoidsCocaineFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineN,N-DimethyltryptaminePhenethylaminesAlkaloidsCannabinoidscathinoneCocaineHallucinogensIllicit DrugsN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineN,N-DimethyltryptaminePhenethylaminesPsychotropic DrugsTryptaminesNovel psychoactive drugsNovel psychoactive substancesPhenethylaminesSynthetic cannabinoidsSynthetic cathinonesTryptamines

Identifiers

PMID26377051
PMCPMC4633323
OpenAlexW1908916962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.