Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26376909›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2016

Psychosocial work factors and sleep problems: findings from the French national SIP survey.

Emilie Chazelle, Jean-François Chastang, Isabelle Niedhammer

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie ChazelleDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, UMR_S 1136, INSERM, 75013, Paris, France.
Jean-François ChastangDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, UMR_S 1136, INSERM, 75013, Paris, France.
Isabelle NiedhammerDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, UMR_S 1136, INSERM, 75013, Paris, France. isabelle.niedhammer@inserm.fr.
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed at exploring the cross-sectional and prospective associations between psychosocial work factors and sleep problems.

methodsThe study population consisted of a national representative sample of the French working population (SIP survey). The sample sizes were 7506 and 3555 for the cross-sectional and prospective analyses. Sleep problems were defined by either sleep disturbances or insufficient sleep duration at least several times a week. Psychosocial work factors included classical (job strain model factors) and emergent factors (recognition, insecurity, role/ethical conflict, emotional demands, work-life imbalance, etc.). Occupational factors related to working time/hours and physical work environment were also included as well as covariates related to factors outside work. Statistical analyses were performed using weighted Poisson regression analysis.

resultsIn the cross-sectional analyses, psychological demands, low social support, low recognition, emotional demands, perception of danger, work-life imbalance and night work were found to be associated with sleep problems. In the prospective analyses, psychological demands and night work were predictive of sleep problems. Using a less conservative method, more factors were found to be associated with sleep problems. Dose-response associations were observed, showing that the more frequent the exposure to these factors, the higher the risk of sleep problems. No effect of repeated exposure was found on sleep problems.

conclusionClassical and emergent psychosocial work factors were associated with sleep problems. More prospective studies and prevention policies may be needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesPrevalenceProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsSleep Wake DisordersSocial SupportCross-sectional analysesDose–response associationsInsufficient sleep durationOccupational factorsProspective analysesPsychosocial work factorsSleep disturbancesSleep problems

Identifiers

PMID26376909
OpenAlexW1858431009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.