Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26376892›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2015

Tobacco use among low-income housing residents: does hardship motivate quit attempts?

R D Tucker-Seeley, S Selk, I Adams, J D Allen, G Sorensen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R D Tucker-SeeleyCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 747, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. retucker@hsph.harvard.edu.
S SelkCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 747, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
I AdamsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J D AllenDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
G SorensenCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 747, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Harvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USTufts University · US

Funding

Determinants of cancer risk in low-income housingR01CA111310 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2005 to 2009
$2.8M
Reducing Social Disparities in Cancer Risk: The Role of Work and Worker HealthK05CA108663 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2004 to 2015
$1.5M
Financial well-being following prostate cancer diagnosisK01CA169041 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TUCKER-SEELEY, REGINALD D. · 2012 to 2016
$675k
NCI NIH HHS 5K05CA108663-05NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA111310-04NCI NIH HHS K01 CA169041NCI NIH HHS K01 CA169041-01NCI NIH HHS K05 CA108663NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to examine material hardship among smokers to determine whether such hardship was positively associated with current attempts to quit tobacco use.

methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from the Health in Common (HIC) study, an observational study to investigate social and physical determinants of cancer risk-related behaviors among residents of low-income housing in three cities in the Boston metropolitan area. In this study, three indicators of hardship were used: food hardship, financial hardship, and material hardship (food and financial hardship combined). Logistic regression models were used to obtain the odds of currently trying to quit among current smokers in the HIC (n = 170) across hardship types experienced, adjusting for sociodemographic and psychosocial factors.

resultsFully adjusted models revealed no statistically significant association between trying to quit tobacco use and indicators of material hardship: food hardship and financial hardship present (OR 1.33 (0.42-4.2); food hardship and no financial hardship OR 3.83 (0.97-15.13); and financial hardship but no food hardship OR 0.5 (0.1-2.39).

conclusionsThese findings suggest that even in the presence of material hardship, low-income housing resident tobacco users are not more likely to quit tobacco use; therefore, cessation efforts focused on the financial benefits of quitting may be insufficient to motivate quit attempts among low-income smokers.

Indexed as

MotivationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBostonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHousingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPovertyRisk-TakingSmoking CessationTobacco Use DisorderHardshipLow incomePublic housingTobacco use

Identifiers

PMID26376892
PMCPMC4694626
OpenAlexW1680307590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.