ArticleEuropean radiology2016
Early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: comparison of single-voxel (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted 18f-fdg pet/ct for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Direct comparison of PET/CT and MRI to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Comparison of MRI vs. [Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- MR spectroscopy in breast cancer metabolomics.Analytical science advances · 2021Review
- Harmonized pretreatment quantitative volume-based FDG-PET/CT parameters for prognosis of stage I-III breast cancer: Multicenter study.Oncotarget · 2021Article
- Can Multi-Parametric MR Based Approach Improve the Predictive Value of Pathological and Clinical Therapeutic Response in Breast Cancer Patients?Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Potential Clinical Applications ofNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017Review
- Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers.European radiology · 2017Article
- Breast PET/MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo prospectively compare performances of single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients.
methodsThirty-five breast cancer patients who received NAC and subsequent surgery were prospectively enrolled. MRS and FDG-PET were performed before and after the 1st NAC cycle. Percentage changes of total choline-containing compounds (tCho) via MRS, and maximum and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVpeak) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) via FDG-PET were measured, and their performances in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) were compared.
resultsOf the 35 patients, 6 showed pCR and 29 showed non-pCR. Mean % reductions of tCho, SUVmax, SUVpeak, and TLG of the pCR group were larger than those of the non-pCR group (-80.3 ± 13.9 % vs. -32.1 ± 49.4 %, P = 0.025; -54.7 ± 22.1 % vs. -26.3 ± 33.7 %, P = 0.058; -60.7 ± 18.3 % vs. -32.3 ± 23.3 %, P = 0.009; -89.5 ± 8.5 % vs. -52.6 ± 36.2 %, P = 0.020). Diagnostic accuracy (area under ROC curve; Az, 0.911) of the % reduction of tCho was comparable to those of %SUVmax (0.822), SUVpeak (0.862), and TLG (0.879) in distinguishing pCR from non-pCR (all P > 0.05).
conclusionMRS showed comparable performance to FDG-PET in early prediction of pCR in breast cancer patients. KEY POINTS: • MRS can predict response to NAC in breast cancer post-1 (st) cycle. • Changes in tCho and SUV after NAC reflect tumour cellularity changes. • MRS can be an alternative to FDG-PET in predicting response to NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.