ArticleJournal of plant research2015
Morphometric analyses of petioles of seedlings grown in a spaceflight experiment.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alterations in physiological and biochemical characteristics of Prunus sibirica seedlings raised from spaceflight seeds.PloS one · 2025Article
- Glycome profiling and immunohistochemistry uncover changes in cell walls of Arabidopsis thaliana roots during spaceflight.NPJ microgravity · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Comparison of Structural Variations and Transposon Alterations in Soybean Cultivars Induced by Spaceflight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Plants in Microgravity: Molecular and Technological Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Conducting Plant Experiments in Space and on the Moon.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Relevance of the Unfolded Protein Response to Spaceflight-Induced Transcriptional Reprogramming inAstrobiology · 2021Article
- A New Era for Space Life Science: International Standards for Space Omics Processing.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- HSFA2 Functions in the Physiological Adaptation of Undifferentiated Plant Cells to Spaceflight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Comparison of Microgravity Analogs to Spaceflight in Studies of Plant Growth and Development.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- ARG1 Functions in the Physiological Adaptation of Undifferentiated Plant Cells to Spaceflight.Astrobiology · 2017Article
- Comparative transcriptomics indicate changes in cell wall organization and stress response in seedlings during spaceflight.American journal of botany · 2017Article
- Space, the final frontier: A critical review of recent experiments performed in microgravity.Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gravity is a constant unidirectional stimulus on Earth, and gravitropism in plants involves three phases: perception, transduction, and response. In shoots, perception takes place within the endodermis. To investigate the cellular machinery of perception in microgravity, we conducted a spaceflight study with Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings, which were grown in microgravity in darkness using the Biological Research in Canisters (BRIC) hardware during space shuttle mission STS-131. In the 14-day-old etiolated plants, we studied seedling development and the morphological parameters of the endodermal cells in the petiole. Seedlings from the spaceflight experiment (FL) were compared to a ground control (GC), which both were in the BRIC flight hardware. In addition, to assay any potential effects from growth in spaceflight hardware, we performed another control by growing seedlings in Petri dishes in standard laboratory conditions (termed the hardware control, HC). Seed germination was significantly lower in samples grown in flight hardware (FL, GC) compared to the HC. In terms of cellular parameters of endodermal cells, the greatest differences also were between seedlings grown in spaceflight hardware (FL, GC) compared to those grown outside of this hardware (HC). Specifically, the endodermal cells were significantly smaller in seedlings grown in the BRIC system compared to those in the HC. However, a change in the shape of the cell, suggesting alterations in the cell wall, was one parameter that appears to be a true microgravity effect. Taken together, our results suggest that caution must be taken when interpreting results from the increasingly utilized BRIC spaceflight hardware system and that it is important to perform additional ground controls to aid in the analysis of spaceflight experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.