Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26376782›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Optimizing appointment template and number of staff of an OB/GYN clinic--micro and macro simulation analyses.

R B Lenin, Curtis L Lowery, Wilbur C Hitt, Nirvana A Manning, Peter Lowery, Hari Eswaran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R B LeninDepartment of Mathematics, University of Central Arkansas, 201 Donaghey Avenue, Conway, 72035, Arkansas, USA. rblenin@uca.edu.
Curtis L LoweryDepartment of OB/GYN, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, 72205, Arkansas, USA. LoweryCurtisL@uams.edu.
Wilbur C HittDepartment of OB/GYN, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, 72205, Arkansas, USA. WCHitt@uams.edu.
Nirvana A ManningDepartment of OB/GYN, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, 72205, Arkansas, USA. NAManning@uams.edu.
Peter LoweryCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, 72205, Arkansas, USA. lowerypeterb@uams.edu.
Hari EswaranDepartment of OB/GYN, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, 72205, Arkansas, USA. EswaranHari@uams.edu.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Central Arkansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) tested various, new system-restructuring ideas such as varying number of different types of nurses to reduce patient wait times for its outpatient clinic, often with little or no effect on waiting time. Witnessing little progress despite these time-intensive interventions, we sought an alternative way to intervene the clinic without affecting the normal clinic operations.

aimThe aim is to identify the optimal (1) time duration between appointments and (2) number of nurses to reduce wait time of patients in the clinic.

methodsWe developed a discrete-event computer simulation model for the OB/GYN clinic. By using the patient tracker (PT) data, appropriate probability distributions of service times of staff were fitted to model different variability in staff service times. These distributions were used to fine-tune the simulation model. We then validated the model by comparing the simulated wait times with the actual wait times calculated from the PT data. The validated model was then used to carry out "what-if" analyses.

resultsThe best scenario yielded 16 min between morning appointments, 19 min between afternoon appointments, and addition of one medical assistant. Besides removing all peak wait times and bottlenecks around noon and late in the afternoon, the best scenario yielded 39.84 % (p<.001), 30.31 % (p<.001), and 15.12 % (p<.001) improvement in patients' average wait times for providers in the exam rooms, average total wait time at various locations and average total spent time in the clinic, respectively. This is achieved without any compromise in the utilization of the staff and in serving all patients by 5 pm.

conclusionsA discrete-event simulation model is developed, validated, and used to carry out "what-if" scenarios to identify the optimal time between appointments and number of nurses. Using the model, we achieved a significant improvement in wait time of patients in the clinic, which the clinic management initially had difficulty achieving through manual interventions. The model provides a tool for the clinic management to test new ideas to improve the performance of other UAMS OB/GYN clinics.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesAppointments and SchedulesGynecologyObstetricsSimulation TrainingComputer SimulationFemaleHumansModels, OrganizationalWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID26376782
PMCPMC4572647
OpenAlexW1933065612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.