Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26376747›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Somatic mosaicism for copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity and DNA copy number variations in the human genome.

Olga Žilina, Marina Koltšina, Raivo Raid, Ants Kurg, Neeme Tõnisson, Andres Salumets

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Somatic mosaicism in inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2021
    Review
  8. Genetics for paediatric radiologists.Pediatric radiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. iPSCs and fibroblast subclones from the same fibroblast population contain comparable levels of sequence variations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga ŽilinaInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia. olga.zhilina@ut.ee.
Marina KoltšinaInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia. marina.koltsina@gmail.com.
Raivo RaidInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia. raivo.raid@ut.ee.
Ants KurgInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia. akurg@ebc.ee.
Neeme TõnissonDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital, L. Puusepa 2, 51014, Tartu, Estonia. neeme.tonisson@ut.ee.
Andres SalumetsCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tiigi 61b, 50410, Tartu, Estonia. andres.salumets@ccrmb.ee.
University of Tartu · EECompetence Centre on Health Technologies (Estonia) · EETartu University Hospital · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatic mosaicism denotes the presence of genetically distinct populations of somatic cells in one individual who has developed from a single fertilised oocyte. Mosaicism may result from a mutation that occurs during postzygotic development and is propagated to only a subset of the adult cells. Our aim was to investigate both somatic mosaicism for copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cn-LOH) events and DNA copy number variations (CNVs) in fully differentiated tissues.

resultsWe studied panels of tissue samples (11-12 tissues per individual) from four autopsy subjects using high-resolution Illumina HumanOmniExpress-12 BeadChips to reveal the presence of possible intra-individual tissue-specific cn-LOH and CNV patterns. We detected five mosaic cn-LOH regions >5 Mb in some tissue samples in three out of four individuals. We also detected three CNVs that affected only a portion of the tissues studied in one out of four individuals. These three somatic CNVs range from 123 to 796 kb and are also found in the general population. An attempt was made to explain the succession of genomic events that led to the observed somatic genetic mosaicism under the assumption that the specific mosaic patterns of CNV and cn-LOH changes reflect their formation during the postzygotic embryonic development of germinal layers and organ systems.

conclusionsOur results give further support to the idea that somatic mosaicism for CNVs, and also cn-LOHs, is a common phenomenon in phenotypically normal humans. Thus, the examination of only a single tissue might not provide enough information to diagnose potentially deleterious CNVs within an individual. During routine CNV and cn-LOH analysis, DNA derived from a buccal swab can be used in addition to blood DNA to get information about the CNV/cn-LOH content in tissues of both mesodermal and ectodermal origin. Currently, the real frequency and possible phenotypic consequences of both CNVs and cn-LOHs that display somatic mosaicism remain largely unknown. To answer these questions, future studies should involve larger cohorts of individuals and a range of tissues.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanLoss of HeterozygosityMosaicismAdultAutopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SpecificityPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID26376747
PMCPMC4573927
OpenAlexW2138358658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.