ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015
Accuracy of Tokuhashi score system in predicting survival of lung cancer patients with vertebral metastasis.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Decision support systems for incurable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Pooled it
- Surgical Management of the Metastatic Spine Disease: A Review of the Literature and Proposed Algorithm.Global spine journal · 2023Review
- Robot and working tube-assisted invasion-controlled surgery for spinal metastases.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- The revised Tokuhashi score; analysis of parameters and assessment of its accuracy in determining survival in patients afflicted with spinal metastasis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controversy exists in the accuracy of Tokuhashi score (TS) system in predicting survival of patients with vertebral metastasis, including vertebral metastases from primary lung cancer. To calculate the accuracy of the TS in predicting survival of lung cancer patients with vertebral metastasis and investigate which subgroup's survival is suitable for TS to predict, we conduct this retrospective study. From January 2008 to December 2013, 151 patients with vertebral metastases from primary lung cancer in our institute were included. The data were censored at December 2014. Patients were classified according to TS. The actual and predicted survivals were compared to calculate the accuracy rate. Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relation between overall survival and TS. Cox regression was carried out to investigate potential factors affecting prognosis. Only 8.6 % (13 patients) actually followed the survivorship pattern as predicted by the TS. Spearman's correlation analysis demonstrated that actual overall survival correlated significantly with the TS. Cox model indicated that status of visceral metastases (i.e., none, involved with lung, involved with extrapulmonary organ) and response to first-time systemic therapy (effective or not) are associated significantly with overall survival. For patients with visceral metastases and progression to first-time systemic therapy simultaneously, predicted survival by TS and actual survival matched well. TS could only predict survival accurately in those with visceral metastases and disease progression to first-time systemic therapy simultaneously. Thus, it may not be a reliable tool to predict survival in lung cancer patients with vertebral metastasis. Status of visceral metastases and response to first-time systemic therapy should be added into TS system to increase validity and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26376655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.