Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26376015›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015

Factors influencing preclinical in vivo evaluation of mumps vaccine strain immunogenicity.

B Halassy, T Kurtović, M Brgles, M Lang Balija, D Forčić

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence-Based Tracking of MDRAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. COVID-19 convalescent plasma as long-term therapy in immunodeficient patients?Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

B Halassya University of Zagreb; Center for Research and Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology ; Zagreb , Croatia.
T Kurtovića University of Zagreb; Center for Research and Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology ; Zagreb , Croatia.
M Brglesa University of Zagreb; Center for Research and Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology ; Zagreb , Croatia.
M Lang Balijac Institute of Immunology Inc.; Quality Control Department ; Zagreb , Croatia.
D Forčića University of Zagreb; Center for Research and Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology ; Zagreb , Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HRQuality Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunogenicity testing in animals is a necessary preclinical assay for demonstration of vaccine efficacy the results of which are often the basis for the decision whether to proceed or withdraw the further development of the novel vaccine candidate. However, in vivo assays are rarely, if at all, optimized and validated. Here we clearly demonstrate the importance of in vivo assay (mumps virus immunogenicity testing in guinea pigs) optimization for gaining reliable results and the suitability of Fractional factorial design of experiments (DoE) for such a purpose. By the use of DoE with resolution IV (2IV((4-1))) we clearly revealed that the parameters significantly increasing assay sensitivity were interval between animal immunizations followed by the body weight of experimental animals. The quantity (0 versus 2%) of the stabilizer (fetal bovine serum, FBS) in the sample was shown as non-influencing parameter in DoE setup. However, the separate experiment investigating only the FBS influence, and performed under other parameters optimally set, showed that FBS also influences the results of immunogenicity assay. Such finding indicated that (a) factors with strong influence on the measured outcome can hide the effects of parameters with modest/low influence and (b) the matrix of mumps virus samples to be compared for immunogenicity must be identical for reliable virus immunogenicity comparison. Finally the 3 mumps vaccine strains widely used for decades in the licensed vaccines were for the first time compared in an animal model, and results obtained were in line with their reported immunogenicity in human population supporting the predictive power of the optimized in vivo assay.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimalsBody WeightDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleGuinea PigsImmunization ScheduleMumps VaccineMumps virusResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeMumps Vaccinedesign of Experiments (DoE)in vivo bioassay optimizationmumps virusnon-clinical vaccine immunogenicity assessment

Identifiers

PMID26376015
PMCPMC4635857
OpenAlexW2263089325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.