Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26375927›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2015

Parallel sparse and dense information coding streams in the electrosensory midbrain.

Michael K J Sproule, Michael G Metzen, Maurice J Chacron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population Coding of Natural Electrosensory Stimuli by Midbrain Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Encoding and Perception of Electro-communication Signals inFrontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  6. Novel Functions of Feedback in Electrosensory Processing.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Optimized Parallel Coding of Second-Order Stimulus Features by Heterogeneous Neural Populations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael K J SprouleDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Michael G MetzenDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maurice J ChacronDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: maurice.chacron@mcgill.ca.

Funding

CIHR 83338-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient processing of incoming sensory information is critical for an organism's survival. It has been widely observed across systems and species that the representation of sensory information changes across successive brain areas. Indeed, peripheral sensory neurons tend to respond densely to a broad range of sensory stimuli while more central neurons tend to instead respond sparsely to a narrow range of stimuli. Such a transition might be advantageous as sparse neural codes are thought to be metabolically efficient and optimize coding efficiency. Here we investigated whether the neural code transitions from dense to sparse within the midbrain Torus semicircularis (TS) of weakly electric fish. Confirming previous results, we found both dense and sparse coding neurons. However, subsequent histological classification revealed that most dense neurons projected to higher brain areas. Our results thus provide strong evidence against the hypothesis that the neural code transitions from dense to sparse in the electrosensory system. Rather, they support the alternative hypothesis that higher brain areas receive parallel streams of dense and sparse coded information from the electrosensory midbrain. We discuss the implications and possible advantages of such a coding strategy and argue that it is a general feature of sensory processing.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric FishElectric StimulationMesencephalonNeuronsMidbrainNeural codeSparsenessWeakly electric fish

Identifiers

PMID26375927
PMCPMC4633296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.