Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26375408›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2015

Identification of the putative binding pocket of valerenic acid on GABAA receptors using docking studies and site-directed mutagenesis.

D Luger, G Poli, M Wieder, M Stadler, S Ke, M Ernst, A Hohaus, T Linder, T Seidel, T Langer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Structural insights into GABANature communications · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Docking-Based Prediction of Peptide Binding to MHC Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent Advances in In Silico Target Fishing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

D LugerDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
G PoliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
M WiederDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
M StadlerDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
S KeDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
M ErnstDepartment of Molecular Neurosciences, Center of Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
A HohausDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
T LinderDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
T SeidelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
T LangerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
S KhomDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
S HeringDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeβ2/3-subunit-selective modulation of GABAA receptors by valerenic acid (VA) is determined by the presence of transmembrane residue β2/3N265. Currently, it is not known whether β2/3N265 is part of VA's binding pocket or is involved in the transduction pathway of VA's action. The aim of this study was to clarify the localization of VA's binding pocket on GABAA receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Docking and a structure-based three-dimensional pharmacophore were employed to identify candidate amino acid residues that are likely to interact with VA. Selected amino acid residues were mutated, and VA-induced modulation of the resulting GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes was analysed. KEY

resultsA binding pocket for VA at the β(+) /α(-) interface encompassing amino acid β3N265 was predicted. Mutational analysis of suggested amino acid residues revealed a complete loss of VA's activity on β3M286W channels as well as significantly decreased efficacy and potency of VA on β3N265S and β3F289S receptors. In addition, reduced efficacy of VA-induced IGABA enhancement was also observed for α1M235W, β3R269A and β3M286A constructs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our data suggest that amino acid residues β3N265, β3F289, β3M286, β3R269 in the β3 subunit, at or near the etomidate/propofol binding site(s), form part of a VA binding pocket. The identification of the binding pocket for VA is essential for elucidating its pharmacological effects and might also help to develop new selective GABAA receptor ligands.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesFemaleIndenesMolecular Docking SimulationMutagenesis, Site-DirectedOocytesReceptors, GABA-ASesquiterpenesXenopus laevisIndenesReceptors, GABA-ASesquiterpenesvalerenic acid

Identifiers

PMID26375408
PMCPMC4988470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.