ArticleChemical biology & drug design2016
Fluorescence Based Characterization of Calcium Sensitizer Action on the Troponin Complex.
Article in Chemical biology & drug design, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.Cardiovascular journal of AfricaTrial
- Istaroxime for Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sarcomere integrated biosensor detects myofilament-activating ligands in real time during twitch contractions in live cardiac muscle.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2020Article
- Treatments targeting inotropy.European heart journal · 2019Article
- Dynamic Equilibrium of Cardiac Troponin C's Hydrophobic Cleft and Its Modulation by CaBioconjugate chemistry · 2017Article
- Changes in the dynamics of the cardiac troponin C molecule explain the effects of CaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Probing the mechanism of cardiovascular drugs using a covalent levosimendan analog.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2016Article
- Sarcomere Dysfunction in Nemaline Myopathy.Journal of neuromuscular diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Calcium sensitizers enhance the transduction of the Ca(2+) signal into force within the heart and have found use in treating heart failure. However the mechanisms of action for most Ca(2+) sensitizers remain unclear. To address this issue an efficient fluorescence based approach to Ca(2+) sensitizer screening was developed which monitors cardiac troponin C's (cTnC's) hydrophobic cleft. This approach was tested on four common Ca(2+) -sensitizers, EMD 57033, levosimendan, bepridil and pimobendan with the aim of elucidating the mechanisms of action for each as well as proving the efficacy of the new screening method. Ca(2+) -titration experiments were employed to determine the effect on Ca(2+) sensitivity and cooperativity of cTnC opening, while stopped flow experiments were used to investigate the impact on cTnC relaxation kinetics. Bepridil was shown to increase the sensitivity of cTnC for Ca(2+) under all reconstitution conditions, sensitization by the other drugs was context dependent. Levosimendan and pimobendan reduced the rate of cTnC closing consistent with a stabilization of cTnC's open conformation while bepridil increased the rate of relaxation. Experiments were also run on samples containing cTnT(T204E), a known Ca(2+) -desensitizing phosphorylation mimic. Levosimendan, bepridil, and pimobendan were found to elevate the Ca(2+) -sensitivity of cTnT(T204E) containing samples in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.