Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26375164›Full record

SynthesisJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Systematic Review of Brain Tumor Treatment in Dogs.

H Hu, A Barker, T Harcourt-Brown, N Jeffery

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Gross target volume contouring in canine extra-axial brain tumors: Effects of magnetic resonance image slice thickness and time between subsequent image sets.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Common Neurologic Diseases in Geriatric Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

H HuDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
A BarkerDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
T Harcourt-BrownDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK.
N JefferyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Iowa State University · USUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial neoplasia is commonly diagnosed in dogs and can be treated by a variety of methods, but formal comparisons of treatment efficacy are currently unavailable. This review was undertaken to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding outcome after the treatment of intracranial masses in dogs, with the aim of defining optimal recommendations for owners. This review summarizes data from 794 cases in 22 previously published reports and follows PRISMA guidelines for systematic review. A Pubmed search was used to identify suitable articles. These then were analyzed for quality and interstudy variability of inclusion and exclusion criteria and the outcome data extracted for summary in graphs and tables. There was a high degree of heterogeneity among studies with respect to inclusion and exclusion criteria, definition of survival periods, and cases lost to follow-up making comparisons among modalities troublesome. There is a need for standardized design and reporting of outcomes of treatment for brain tumors in dogs. The available data do not support lomustine as an effective treatment, but also do not show a clear difference in outcome between radiotherapy and surgery for those cases in which the choice is available.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsDog DiseasesDogsRadiotherapyAntineoplastic AgentsCraniotomyGliomaMeningiomaOutcomeRadiationRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID26375164
PMCPMC4895648
OpenAlexW1952890439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.