Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26374729›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness questionnaire - a new measure of medical student and physician confidence in exhibiting patient-centered behaviors.

Robert Zachariae, Maja O'Connor, Berit Lassesen, Martin Olesen, Louise Binow Kjær, Marianne Thygesen, Anne Mette Mørcke

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Learning from patients' written feedback: medical students' experiences.International journal of medical education · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  17. Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health-care professionals: Co-construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert ZachariaeUnit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 9, DK8000, Aarhus, Denmark. bzach@aarhus.rm.dk.
Maja O'ConnorUnit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 9, DK8000, Aarhus, Denmark. maja@psy.au.dk.
Berit LassesenCenter for Teaching and Learning, School of Business and Social Science, Aarhus University, Fuglsangs Alle 4, 8210, Aarhus, Denmark. belas@au.dk.
Martin OlesenUnit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 9, DK8000, Aarhus, Denmark. psykmh@gmail.com.
Louise Binow KjærCentre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, INCUBA, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, bld. B, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark. louise@cesu.au.dk.
Marianne ThygesenFaculty of Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3, 5000, Odense, Denmark. mthygesen@health.sdu.dk.
Anne Mette MørckeCentre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, INCUBA, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, bld. B, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark. amm@cesu.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-centered communication is a core competency in modern health care and associated with higher levels of patient satisfaction, improved patient health outcomes, and lower levels of burnout among physicians. The objective of the present study was to develop a questionnaire assessing medical student and physician self-efficacy in patient-centeredness (SEPCQ) and explore its psychometric properties.

methodsA preliminary 88-item questionnaire (SEPCQ-88) was developed based on a review of the literature and medical student portfolios and completed by 448 medical students from Aarhus University. Exploratory Principal Component analysis resulted in a 27-item version (SEPCQ-27) with three underlying self-efficacy factors: 1) Exploring the patient perspective, 2) Sharing information and power, and 3) Dealing with communicative challenges. The SEPCQ-27 was completed by an independent sample of 291 medical students from 2 medical schools and 101 hospital physicians.

resultsInternal consistencies of total and subscales were acceptable for both students and physicians (Cronbach's alpha (range): 0.74-0.95). There were no overall indications of gender-related differential item function (DIF), and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated good fit (CFI = 0.98; NNFI = 0.98; RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.07). Responsiveness was indicated by increases in SEPCQ scores after a course in communication and peer-supervision (Cohen's d (range): 0.21 to 0.73; p: 0.053 to 0.001). Furthermore, positive associations were found between increases in SEPCQ-scores and course-related motivation to learn (medical students) and between SEPCQ scores and years of clinical experience (physicians).

conclusionsThe final SEPCQ-27 showed satisfactory psychometric properties, and preliminary support was found for its construct validity, indicating that the SEPCQ-27 may be a valuable measure in future patient centered communication training and research.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePatient-Centered CarePhysiciansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26374729
PMCPMC4572680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.