Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26374633›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Repurposing some older drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier and have potential anticancer activity to provide new treatment options for glioblastoma.

Dayle Rundle-Thiele, Richard Head, Leah Cosgrove, Jennifer H Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Drug vector representation: a tool for drug similarity analysis.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Receptor-Targeted Glial Brain Tumor Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dayle Rundle-ThieleSchool of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Richard HeadFuture Industries Institute, Research and Innovation Portfolio, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Leah CosgroveCSIRO, Human and Nutrition Flagship, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jennifer H MartinSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a brain neoplasm with limited 5-year survival rates. Developments of new treatment regimens that improve patient survival in patients with glioblastoma are needed. It is likely that a number of existing drugs used in other conditions have potential anticancer effects that offer significant survival benefit to glioblastoma patients. Identification of such drugs could provide a novel treatment paradigm.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug RepositioningBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansAntineoplastic Agentsantidepressantsantiepileptic drugsantihypertensivebeta-blockersglioblastomastatins

Identifiers

PMID26374633
PMCPMC4833171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.