Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26374625›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases--comparison of REDUCtion of prasugrEl dose or POLYmer TECHnology in ACS patients (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS RCT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Joo Myung Lee, Ji-Hyun Jung, Kyung Woo Park, Eun-Seok Shin, Seok Kyu Oh, Jang-Whan Bae, Jay Young Rhew, Namho Lee, Dong-Bin Kim, Ung Kim and 16 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02193971 (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases Trial - Comparison of REDUCTION of PrasugrEl Dose & POLYmer TECHnology in ACS Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02193971 phase4completednot on this map

Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases Trial - Comparison of REDUCTION of PrasugrEl Dose & POLYmer TECHnology in ACS Patients (HOST REDUCE POLYTECH RCT Trial) Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Biostable Polymer DES (Promus PremierTM, Xience Alpine®, and Resolute Onyx®) With Biodegradable Polymer DES (Biomatrix®, Biomatrix Flex®, Nobori®, Ultimaster®,Synergy®, and Orsiro®)and Conventional Dose Prasugrel Therapy With Reduced Dose Prasugrel Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2014 to 2024Enrolled3,429ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsBS-DES (Biostable polymer drug-eluting stent), BD-DES (Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent), Prasugrel 5mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Durable-polymer versus biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: three-year outcomes of the HOST REDUCE POLYTECH RCT Trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a post hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Joo Myung LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. drone80@hanmail.net.
Ji-Hyun JungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. jbjhyun@naver.com.
Kyung Woo ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. kwparkmd@snu.ac.kr.
Eun-Seok ShinDivision of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea. sesim1989@gmail.com.
Seok Kyu OhDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea. oskcar@wonkwang.ac.kr.
Jang-Whan BaeChungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea. drcorazon@hanmail.net.
Jay Young RhewDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Republic of Korea. jyrhew@nate.com.
Namho LeeCardiology Division, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. krheart@hallym.or.kr.
Dong-Bin KimCardiovascular Center, St. Paul's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. kim-dongbin@hanmail.net.
Ung KimDivision of Cardiology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea. woongwa@hanmail.net.
Jung-Kyu HanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. hpcrates@medimail.co.kr.
Sang Eun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. sangeunlee.md@gmail.com.
Han-Mo YangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. hanname@hanmail.net.
Hyun-Jae KangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. nowkang@snu.ac.kr.
Bon-Kwon KooDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. bkkoo@snu.ac.kr.
Sanghyun KimCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. shkimmd@snu.ac.kr.
Yun Kyeong ChoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. ds010042@gmail.com.
Won-Yong ShinDepartment of Cardiology, Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Cheonan, Cheonan, Korea. shinwy@schmc.ac.kr.
Young-Hyo LimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. mdoim@hanyang.ac.kr.
Seung-Woon RhaKorea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. swrha617@yahoo.co.kr.
Seok-Yeon KimDepartment of Cardiology, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. ks7688@hanmail.net.
Sung Yun LeeInje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea. im2pci@gmail.com.
Young-Dae KimDepartment of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea. kimyd@mail.donga.ac.kr.
In-Ho ChaeSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. ihchae@snubh.org.
Kwang Soo ChaDepartment of Cardiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea. chakws1@hanmail.net.
Hyo-Soo KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. usahyosoo@gmail.com.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRChungbuk National University · KRDong-A University Hospital · KRHallym University Medical Center · KRHanyang University Medical Center · KRInje University Ilsan Paik Hospital · KRKeimyung University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRPresbyterian Medical Center · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRSeoul Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan · KRSt. Paul's Hospital · KRUlsan University Hospital · KRWonkwang University · KRYeungnam University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiplatelet treatment is an important component in optimizing the clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prasugrel, which is a new P2Y12 inhibitor, has been confirmed as efficacious in a large trial in Western countries, and a similar trial is also to be launched in Asian countries. Although a 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel followed by 10 mg per day should be acceptable, there have been no data regarding the optimal dose in Asian patients. Furthermore, serum levels of prasugrel and the rates of platelet inhibition are known to be higher in Asians than Caucasians with the same dose of the drug. Polymer, a key component of drug-eluting stents (DES), has been suggested as the cause of inflammation leading to late complications, and has driven many companies to develop biodegradable-polymer DES. Currently, there are limited data regarding the head-to-head comparison between BP-BES and the biostable polymer CoCr-EES or the newest platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES). Furthermore, the polymer issue may be more important in ACS where there is ruptured thrombotic plaque where polymer-induced inflammation may affect the local milieu of the stented artery. Therefore, the present study dedicated only to ACS patients, will offer important information on the optimal prasugrel dose in the Asian population by comparing a 10-mg versus a 5-mg maintenance dose beyond 1 month after PCI, as well as giving important insight into the polymer issue by comparing BP-BES versus biostable-polymer PtCr-EES. METHOD/

designHarmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases--comparison of REDUCtion of prasugrEl dose or POLYmer TECHnology in ACS patients (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS) trial is a multicenter, randomized and open-label clinical study with a 2 × 2 factorial design, according to the type of stent (PtCr-EES versus BP-BES) and prasugrel maintenance dose (5 mg versus 10 mg), to demonstrate non-inferiority of PtCr-EES relative to BP-BES or the reduced prasugrel dose relative to conventional dose in an Asian all-comers PCI population presenting with ACS. Approximately 3400 patients will undergo prospective, random assignment separately to either stent or prasugrel arm (1:1 ratio, respectively). When the patients have contraindications to prasugrel, they are categorized into an antiplatelet observation group after stent-randomization. The primary endpoint is the patient-oriented composite outcome, which is a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction (MI), any repeat revascularization in the stent arm at 12 months after index PCI. In the prasugrel arm, primary endpoint is any major adverse cardiovascular event, which is a composite of all-cause mortality, any MI, any stent thrombosis (Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-defined), any repeat revascularization, stroke, or bleeding (BARC class ≥ 2). DISCUSSION: The HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS RCT is the first study exploring the optimal maintenance dose of prasugrel beyond 1 month after PCI for ACS in Asian all-comers. In addition, this is the largest study dedicated only to ACS patients to evaluate the polymer issue in the situation of ACS by directly comparing biostable-polymer PtCr-EES versus BP-BES.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02193971, 13 July 2014).

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsDrug-Eluting StentsPolymersAcute Coronary SyndromeAsian PeopleCause of DeathClinical ProtocolsEverolimusHemorrhageHumansMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochlorideProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignEverolimusPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPolymersPrasugrel Hydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID26374625
PMCPMC4570043
OpenAlexW1820604140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.