ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2016
Inverse relationship between a genetic risk score of 31 BMI loci and weight change before and after reaching middle age.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Obesity, physical activity, and gene-environment interactions: a natural experiment framework.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Cohort profile: The Obesity and Disease Development Sweden (ODDS) study, a pooled cohort.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The timing of adiposity and changes in the life course on the risk of cancer.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2022Review
- Causality Inference of Obesity and Cancer Risk by Mendelian Randomization Analysis: Are We There Yet?Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- The Role of Mendelian Randomization Studies in Deciphering the Effect of Obesity on Cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- Associations of obesity and circulating insulin and glucose with breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- Obesity genetics and cardiometabolic health: Potential for risk prediction.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2019Review
- Using metabolite profiling to construct and validate a metabolite risk score for predicting future weight gain.PloS one · 2019Article
- Adiposity and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: Results from the UK Biobank prospective cohort.International journal of cancer · 2018Article
- Associations between genetic variants associated with body mass index and trajectories of body fatness across the life course: a longitudinal analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- Genetic predisposition to obesity, restrained eating and changes in body weight: a population-based prospective study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2018Article
- Article
- Influence of Fetal and Maternal Genetic Susceptibility to Obesity on Birthweight in African Ancestry Populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Genetically Predicted Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Risk: Mendelian Randomization Analyses of Data from 145,000 Women of European Descent.PLoS medicine · 2016Article
- Cardio-metabolic parameters are associated with genetic admixture estimates in a pediatric population from Colombia.BMC genetics · 2016Article
- Article
- Breastfeeding is associated with waist-to-height ratio in young adults.BMC public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveGenome-wide-association studies have identified numerous body mass index (BMI)-associated variants, but it is unclear how these relate to weight gain in adults at different ages.
methodsWe examined the association of a genetic risk score (GRS), consisting of 31 BMI-associated variants, with an annual weight change (AWC) and a substantial weight gain (SWG) of 10% by comparing self-reported weight at 20 years (y) with baseline weight (mean: 58 y; s.d.: 8 y) in 21407 participants from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS), and comparing baseline weight to weight at follow-up (mean: 73 y; s.d.: 6 y) among 2673 participants. Association between GRS and AWG and SWG was replicated in 4327 GLACIER (Gene x Lifestyle interactions And Complex traits Involved in Elevated disease Risk) participants (mean: 45 y; s.d.: 7 y) with 10 y follow-up. Cohort-specific results were pooled by fixed-effect meta-analyses.
resultsIn MDCS, the GRS was associated with increased AWC (β: 0.003; s.e: 0.01; P: 7 × 10(-8)) and increased odds for SWG (odds ratio (OR) 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.02); P: 0.013) per risk-allele from age 20y, but unexpectedly with decreased AWC (β: -0.006; s.e: 0.002; P: 0.009) and decreased odds for SWG OR 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.98); P: 0.001) between baseline and follow-up. Effect estimates from age 20 y to baseline differed significantly from those from baseline to follow-up (P: 0.0002 for AWC and P: 0.0001 for SWG). Similar to MDCS, the GRS was associated with decreased odds for SWG OR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00); P: 0.029) from baseline to follow-up in GLACIER. In meta-analyses (n=7000), the GRS was associated with decreased AWC (β: -0.005; s.e.m. 0.002; P: 0.002) and decreased odds for SWG OR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99); P: 0.001) per risk-allele.
conclusionsOur results provide convincing evidence for a paradoxical inversed relationship between a high number of BMI-associated risk-alleles and less weight gain during and after middle-age, in contrast to the expected increased weight gain seen in younger age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.