Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26374125›Full record

ArticlemBio2015

Insights into Substrate Specificity of NlpC/P60 Cell Wall Hydrolases Containing Bacterial SH3 Domains.

Qingping Xu, Dominique Mengin-Lecreulx, Xueqian W Liu, Delphine Patin, Carol L Farr, Joanna C Grant, Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Mark W Knuth, Adam Godzik and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A lipid cue drives the subcellular localization of a self-inserting bacterial transmembrane protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation and development of diagnostic tools for rapid detection ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structural Investigations on the SH3b Domains ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biochemistry · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. LipoproteinmBio · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. eLife · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Qingping XuJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Dominique Mengin-LecreulxInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), UMR 9198, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France mengin-lecreulx@u-psud.fr wilson@scripps.edu.
Xueqian W LiuJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Delphine PatinInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), UMR 9198, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France.
Carol L FarrJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Joanna C GrantJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Hsiu-Ju ChiuJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Lukasz JaroszewskiJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Mark W KnuthJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Adam GodzikJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Scott A LesleyJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Marc-André ElsligerJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Ashley M DeaconJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Ian A WilsonJoint Center for Structural Genomics‡ Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA mengin-lecreulx@u-psud.fr wilson@scripps.edu.
Joint Center for Structural Genomics · USStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource · USScripps Research Institute · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation · USSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Structure Determination Core at SSRLU54GM094586 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI HODGSON, KEITH O · 2010 to 2014
$40.1M
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) pp.711-759P41GM103393 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HODGSON, KEITH O · 2012 to 2019
$30.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103393NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM103393NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledBacterial SH3 (SH3b) domains are commonly fused with papain-like Nlp/P60 cell wall hydrolase domains. To understand how the modular architecture of SH3b and NlpC/P60 affects the activity of the catalytic domain, three putative NlpC/P60 cell wall hydrolases were biochemically and structurally characterized. These enzymes all have γ-d-Glu-A2pm (A2pm is diaminopimelic acid) cysteine amidase (or dl-endopeptidase) activities but with different substrate specificities. One enzyme is a cell wall lysin that cleaves peptidoglycan (PG), while the other two are cell wall recycling enzymes that only cleave stem peptides with an N-terminal l-Ala. Their crystal structures revealed a highly conserved structure consisting of two SH3b domains and a C-terminal NlpC/P60 catalytic domain, despite very low sequence identity. Interestingly, loops from the first SH3b domain dock into the ends of the active site groove of the catalytic domain, remodel the substrate binding site, and modulate substrate specificity. Two amino acid differences at the domain interface alter the substrate binding specificity in favor of stem peptides in recycling enzymes, whereas the SH3b domain may extend the peptidoglycan binding surface in the cell wall lysins. Remarkably, the cell wall lysin can be converted into a recycling enzyme with a single mutation. IMPORTANCE: Peptidoglycan is a meshlike polymer that envelops the bacterial plasma membrane and bestows structural integrity. Cell wall lysins and recycling enzymes are part of a set of lytic enzymes that target covalent bonds connecting the amino acid and amino sugar building blocks of the PG network. These hydrolases are involved in processes such as cell growth and division, autolysis, invasion, and PG turnover and recycling. To avoid cleavage of unintended substrates, these enzymes have very selective substrate specificities. Our biochemical and structural analysis of three modular NlpC/P60 hydrolases, one lysin, and two recycling enzymes, show that they may have evolved from a common molecular architecture, where the substrate preference is modulated by local changes. These results also suggest that new pathways for recycling PG turnover products, such as tracheal cytotoxin, may have evolved in bacteria in the human gut microbiome that involve NlpC/P60 cell wall hydrolases.

Indexed as

src Homology DomainsAminopeptidasesBacterial ProteinsCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDNA Mutational AnalysisModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsProtein ConformationSubstrate SpecificityAminopeptidasesBacterial Proteinscysteine aminopeptidaseMutant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26374125
PMCPMC4600125
OpenAlexW1950815693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.