Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26373721›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2016

Interval training in the boundaries of severe domain: effects on aerobic parameters.

Tiago Turnes, Rafael Alves de Aguiar, Rogério Santos de Oliveira Cruz, Fabrizio Caputo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05742542 (The Effects of High vs. Low Time Spent Near VO2max During Two Work-matched High Intensity Interval Training.), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05742542 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of High vs. Low Time Spent Near VO2max During Two Work-matched High Intensity Interval Training.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the State of Santa CatarinaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsVO2maxArmsExercise training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metabolic, V̇OPhysiological reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiago TurnesHuman Performance Research Group, Center for Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University, Pascoal Simone, 358, Coqueiros, Florianópolis, SC, CEP 88080-350, Brazil. tiagoturnes89@gmail.com.
Rafael Alves de AguiarHuman Performance Research Group, Center for Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University, Pascoal Simone, 358, Coqueiros, Florianópolis, SC, CEP 88080-350, Brazil.
Rogério Santos de Oliveira CruzHuman Performance Research Group, Center for Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University, Pascoal Simone, 358, Coqueiros, Florianópolis, SC, CEP 88080-350, Brazil.
Fabrizio CaputoHuman Performance Research Group, Center for Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University, Pascoal Simone, 358, Coqueiros, Florianópolis, SC, CEP 88080-350, Brazil. fabrizio.caputo@udesc.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough time spent at VO2max (t@VO2max) has been suggested as an optimal stimulus for the promotion of greater VO2max improvements, scientific findings supporting this notion are surprisingly still lacking. To investigate this, the present study described t@VO2max in two different severe-intensity interval training regimens and compared its effects on aerobic indexes after a 4-week intervention.

methodsTwenty-one recreational cyclists performed an incremental exercise test and six time-to-exhaustion tests on four different days to determine VO2max, lactate threshold (LT), critical power (CP) and the highest intensity (IHIGH) and lowest exercise duration (TLOW) at which VO2max was attained. Subjects were assigned to the lower (LO, n = 11, 4 × 5 min at 105% CP, 1 min recovery) or the upper severe-intensity training groups (UP, n = 10, 8 × 60% TLOW at 100% IHIGH, 1:2 work:recovery ratio). t@VO2max was measured during the first and last training sessions.

resultsA significantly higher t@VO2max was elicited in the UP during training sessions in comparison with the LO group (P < 0.05), and superior improvements were observed in VO2max (change in measure ± 95% confidence interval) (6.3 ± 1.9 vs. 3.3 ± 1.8%, P = 0.034 for interaction terms) and LT (54.8 ± 11.8 vs. 27.9 ± 11.3%, P = 0.023 for interaction terms). The other aerobic indexes were similarly improved between the groups.

conclusionThe present results demonstrated that UP training produced superior gains in VO2max and LT in comparison with LO training, which may be associated with the higher t@VO2max.

Indexed as

Physical Education and TrainingAdultAnaerobic ThresholdExerciseExercise TestFemaleHumansLactic AcidMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EnduranceYoung AdultLactic AcidExercise toleranceHigh-intensity interval trainingIntensity exercise domainsMaximal oxygen uptakeShort termTime at O2max

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.