ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2016
Assessment of potential vessel segmentation pitfalls in the analysis of blood flow velocity using the Retinal Function Imager.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory study of non-invasive, high-resolution functional macular imaging in subjects with diabetic retinopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Comparison of Retinal Microvessel Blood Flow Velocities Acquired with Two Different Fields of View.Journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of our study was to investigate the potential pitfalls associated with different vessel segmentation methods using the built-in software of the Retinal Function Imager (RFI) for the analysis of retinal blood flow velocity (BFV).
methodsTen eyes of nine healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Retinal blood flow measurements were obtained with the RFI device with a 20° field of view imaging. The same grader segmented the retinal vasculature using the RFI software in both sessions, with segments ranging in length from 50 to 100 pixels ("short segments") and 100-200 pixels ("long segments"). The blood flow velocities for the arteriolar and venular system were calculated, and the percentage of excluded vessel segments with high coefficients of variation (>45 %) was recorded and compared by paired t test. Spearman's correlation was used to analyze the relationship between measurements by the two vessel segmentation methods.
resultsThe number of analyzed vessel segments did not differ significantly between the two groups (28.6 ± 2.6 short and 26.7 ± 4.6 long segments), while the percentage of acceptable segments was significantly higher in the long segment group (65.2 ± 11.4 % vs 85.2 ± 5.87 %, p = 0.001). In the short segment group, more than 15 % of vessel segments were rejected in all subjects, while in the long segment group only three subjects had a rejection rate of greater than 15 % (16.7 %, 18.7 % and 28 %). Both arteriolar and venular velocities were lower in the short segment group, although it reached significance only for arteriolar velocities (3.93 ± 0.55 vs. 4.45 ± 0.76 mm/s, p = 0.036 and 2.95 ± 0.56 vs. 3.17 ± 0.84 mm/s, p = 0.201 for arterioles and venules, respectively). Only venular velocities showed significant correlation (p = 0.003, R (2) = 0.67) between the two groups.
conclusionsOur results suggest that BFV measurements by the RFI may be affected by segment length, and care should therefore be taken in choosing vessel segment lengths used during the analysis of RFI data. Long segments of 100-200 pixels (400-800 μm) seem to provide more robust measurements, which can be explained by the analysis methodology of the RFI device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.