Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26372279›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2015

Characterizing retention in HAART as a recurrent event process: insights into 'cascade churn'.

Bohdan Nosyk, Lillian Lourenço, Jeong Eun Min, Dimitry Shopin, Viviane D Lima, Julio S G Montaner, STOP HIVAIDS Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bohdan NosykaBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS bFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University cDivision of AIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lillian Lourenço
Jeong Eun Min
Dimitry Shopin
Viviane D Lima
Julio S G Montaner
STOP HIVAIDS Study Group

Funding

Seek and Treat for Optimal Outcomes and Prevention in HIV & AIDS in IDUDP1DA026182 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MONTANER, JULIO SERGIO GONZALEZ · 2008 to 2013
$3.9M
Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV & AIDS (STOP HIV/AIDS) in BCR01DA036307 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI MONTANER, JULIO SERGIO GONZALEZ · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
An empirical investigation into recovery from illicit drug abuse using recurrentR01DA032551 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI MONTANER, JULIO SERGIO GONZALEZ, NOSYK, BOHDAN · 2012 to 2014
$500k
NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA026182NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032551NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA032551NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe benefits of HAART rely on continuous lifelong treatment retention. We used linked population-level health administrative data to characterize durations of HAART retention and nonretention.

designThis is a retrospective cohort study.

methodsWe considered individuals initiating HAART in British Columbia (1996-2012). An HAART episode was considered discontinued if individuals had a gap of at least 30 days between days in which medication was prescribed. We considered durations of HAART retention and nonretention separately, and used Cox proportional hazards frailty models to identify demographic and treatment-related factors associated with durations of HAART retention and nonretention.

resultsSix thousand one hundred fifty-two individuals were included in the analysis; 81.2% were male, 40.6% were people who inject drugs, and 42.8% initiated treatment with CD4 cell count less than 200 cells/μl. Overall, 29% were continuously retained on HAART through the end of follow-up. HAART episodes were a median 6.8 months (25th, 75th percentile: 2.3, 19.5), whereas off-HAART episodes lasted a median 1.9 months (1.2, 4.5). In Cox proportional hazards frailty models, durations of HAART retention improved over time. Successive treatment episodes tended to decrease in duration among those with multiple attempts, whereas off-HAART episodes remained relatively stable. Younger age, earlier stages of disease progression, and injection drug use were all associated with shorter durations of HAART retention and longer off-HAART durations.

conclusionMetrics to monitor HAART retention, dropout, and reentry should be prioritized for HIV surveillance. Clinical strategies and public health policies are urgently needed to improve HAART retention, particularly among those at earlier stages of disease progression, the young, and people who inject drugs.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveMedication AdherenceAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsBritish ColumbiaEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsYoung AdultAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID26372279
PMCPMC4571284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.