ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Structural Bridges through Fold Space.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrastive learning unites sequence and structure in a global representation of protein space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- On Protein Loops, Prior Molecular States and Common Ancestors of Life.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Review
- Deep generative models of protein structure uncover distant relationships across a continuous fold space.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Reused Protein Segments Linked to Functional Dynamics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- EncoMPASS: An encyclopedia of membrane proteins analyzed by structure and symmetry.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2024Article
- A review of visualisations of protein fold networks and their relationship with sequence and function.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023Review
- Evidence for the emergence of β-trefoils by 'Peptide Budding' from an IgG-like β-sandwich.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Bridging Themes: Short Protein Segments Found in Different Architectures.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Urfold: Structural similarity just above the superfold level?Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019Article
- Modular origins of biological electron transfer chains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Development of a motif-based topology-independent structure comparison method to identify evolutionarily related folds.Proteins · 2016Article
- Protein Design: Getting to the bottom of the TIM barrel.Nature chemical biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several protein structure classification schemes exist that partition the protein universe into structural units called folds. Yet these schemes do not discuss how these units sit relative to each other in a global structure space. In this paper we construct networks that describe such global relationships between folds in the form of structural bridges. We generate these networks using four different structural alignment methods across multiple score thresholds. The networks constructed using the different methods remain a similar distance apart regardless of the probability threshold defining a structural bridge. This suggests that at least some structural bridges are method specific and that any attempt to build a picture of structural space should not be reliant on a single structural superposition method. Despite these differences all representations agree on an organisation of fold space into five principal community structures: all-α, all-β sandwiches, all-β barrels, α/β and α + β. We project estimated fold ages onto the networks and find that not only are the pairings of unconnected folds associated with higher age differences than bridged folds, but this difference increases with the number of networks displaying an edge. We also examine different centrality measures for folds within the networks and how these relate to fold age. While these measures interpret the central core of fold space in varied ways they all identify the disposition of ancestral folds to fall within this core and that of the more recently evolved structures to provide the peripheral landscape. These findings suggest that evolutionary information is encoded along these structural bridges. Finally, we identify four highly central pivotal folds representing dominant topological features which act as key attractors within our landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.