Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26372120›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2015

Empirically based comparisons of the reliability and validity of common quantification approaches for eyeblink startle potentiation in humans.

Daniel E Bradford, Mark J Starr, Alexander J Shackman, John J Curtin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Whose Signals Are Being Amplified? Toward a More Equitable Clinical Psychophysiology.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fear-potentiated startle reveals diminished threat extinction in pathological anxiety.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Alcohol's effects during uncertain and uncontrollable stressors in the laboratory.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel E BradfordDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Mark J StarrDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Alexander J ShackmanDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, and Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
John J CurtinDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN EMOTION RESEARCHT32MH018931 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Richard J Davidson · 1989 to 2026
$11.6M
Clinical Relevance of Stress Neuroadaptation in Tobacco DependenceR01DA033809 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CURTIN, JOHN J. · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033809NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018931NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018931-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Startle potentiation is a well-validated translational measure of negative affect. Startle potentiation is widely used in clinical and affective science, and there are multiple approaches for its quantification. The three most commonly used approaches quantify startle potentiation as the increase in startle response from a neutral to threat condition based on (1) raw potentiation, (2) standardized potentiation, or (3) percent-change potentiation. These three quantification approaches may yield qualitatively different conclusions about effects of independent variables (IVs) on affect when within- or between-group differences exist for startle response in the neutral condition. Accordingly, we directly compared these quantification approaches in a shock-threat task using four IVs known to influence startle response in the no-threat condition: probe intensity, time (i.e., habituation), alcohol administration, and individual differences in general startle reactivity measured at baseline. We confirmed the expected effects of time, alcohol, and general startle reactivity on affect using self-reported fear/anxiety as a criterion. The percent-change approach displayed apparent artifact across all four IVs, which raises substantial concerns about its validity. Both raw and standardized potentiation approaches were stable across probe intensity and time, which supports their validity. However, only raw potentiation displayed effects that were consistent with a priori specifications and/or the self-report criterion for the effects of alcohol and general startle reactivity. Supplemental analyses of reliability and validity for each approach provided additional evidence in support of raw potentiation.

Indexed as

IndividualityAcoustic StimulationAffectBlinkingFearFemaleHumansMaleReflex, StartleReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsYoung AdultAnalysis/statistical methodsAnxietyEMGStartle blink

Identifiers

PMID26372120
PMCPMC4715694
OpenAlexW1852855910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.