Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26372011›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Environmental Persistence of Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus subtilis Spores.

Joseph P Wood, Kathryn M Meyer, Thomas J Kelly, Young W Choi, James V Rogers, Karen B Riggs, Zachary J Willenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fate and transport of viableJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of COMicrobial ecology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor Decontamination of Hazard Group 3 Bacteria and Viruses in a Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome Sequences of Two Bacillus Phages Isolated from Indonesia.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph P WoodUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Homeland Security Research Center, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kathryn M MeyerOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States of America.
Thomas J KellyBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Young W ChoiBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
James V RogersBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Karen B RiggsBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Zachary J WillenbergBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of data for how the viability of biological agents may degrade over time in different environments. In this study, experiments were conducted to determine the persistence of Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus subtilis spores on outdoor materials with and without exposure to simulated sunlight, using ultraviolet (UV)-A/B radiation. Spores were inoculated onto glass, wood, concrete, and topsoil and recovered after periods of 2, 14, 28, and 56 days. Recovery and inactivation kinetics for the two species were assessed for each surface material and UV exposure condition. Results suggest that with exposure to UV, decay of spore viability for both Bacillus species occurs in two phases, with an initial rapid decay, followed by a slower inactivation period. The exception was with topsoil, in which there was minimal loss of spore viability in soil over 56 days, with or without UV exposure. The greatest loss in viable spore recovery occurred on glass with UV exposure, with nearly a four log10 reduction after just two days. In most cases, B. subtilis had a slower rate of decay than B. anthracis, although less B. subtilis was recovered initially.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysBacillus anthracisBacillus subtilisDose-Response Relationship, RadiationKineticsMicrobial ViabilityPorositySpecies SpecificitySpores, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26372011
PMCPMC4570822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.