Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26371554›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Abundant toxin-related genes in the genomes of beneficial symbionts from deep-sea hydrothermal vent mussels.

Lizbeth Sayavedra, Manuel Kleiner, Ruby Ponnudurai, Silke Wetzel, Eric Pelletier, Valerie Barbe, Nori Satoh, Eiichi Shoguchi, Dennis Fink, Corinna Breusing and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The genome of the deep-sea anemoneProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A virulentVirulence · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Lizbeth SayavedraMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Manuel KleinerMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Ruby PonnuduraiInstitute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.
Silke WetzelMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Eric PelletierGenoscope - Centre National de Séquençage, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France.
Valerie BarbeGenoscope - Centre National de Séquençage, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France.
Nori SatohMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna, Japan.
Eiichi ShoguchiMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna, Japan.
Dennis FinkMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Corinna BreusingEvolutionary Ecology, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Thorsten Bh ReuschEvolutionary Ecology, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Philip RosenstielInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany.
Markus B SchilhabelInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany.
Dörte BecherInstitute of Marine Biotechnology, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas SchwederInstitute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.
Stephanie MarkertInstitute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.
Nicole DubilierMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Jillian M PetersenMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology · DEUniversität Greifswald · DEGenoscope · FRGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel · DEInstitute of Molecular Biology · DEOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPInstitute of Marine Biotechnology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bathymodiolus mussels live in symbiosis with intracellular sulfur-oxidizing (SOX) bacteria that provide them with nutrition. We sequenced the SOX symbiont genomes from two Bathymodiolus species. Comparison of these symbiont genomes with those of their closest relatives revealed that the symbionts have undergone genome rearrangements, and up to 35% of their genes may have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer. Many of the genes specific to the symbionts were homologs of virulence genes. We discovered an abundant and diverse array of genes similar to insecticidal toxins of nematode and aphid symbionts, and toxins of pathogens such as Yersinia and Vibrio. Transcriptomics and proteomics revealed that the SOX symbionts express the toxin-related genes (TRGs) in their hosts. We hypothesize that the symbionts use these TRGs in beneficial interactions with their host, including protection against parasites. This would explain why a mutualistic symbiont would contain such a remarkable 'arsenal' of TRGs.

Indexed as

Hydrothermal VentsAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBacteriaBacterial ToxinsBivalviaDNA, BacterialGene Expression ProfilingGenome, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataProteomeSeawaterSequence Analysis, DNASymbiosisBacterial ToxinsDNA, BacterialProteomeBathymodiolusevolutionary biologygenomicsinfectious diseasemicrobiologysulfur oxidizersymbiosistoxins

Identifiers

PMID26371554
PMCPMC4612132
OpenAlexW1570215324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.