Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26371522›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical oncology2015

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Local Excision in Early Stage Rectal Cancer.

Suzanne Russo, A William Blackstock, Joseph M Herman, May Abdel-Wahab, Nilofer Azad, Prajnan Das, Karyn A Goodman, Theodore S Hong, Salma K Jabbour, William E Jones and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Suzanne Russo*Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Western Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH †Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC ‡Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, American Society of Clinical Oncology §Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH ∥MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, American College of Surgeons ¶Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY #Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA **Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ ††University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX ‡‡The Chester County Hospital, West Chester, PA §§Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA ∥∥Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD ¶¶Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL ##Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR ***Cancer Center of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
A William Blackstock
Joseph M Herman
May Abdel-Wahab
Nilofer Azad
Prajnan Das
Karyn A Goodman
Theodore S Hong
Salma K Jabbour
William E Jones
Andre A Konski
Albert C Koong
Rachit Kumar
Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas
William Small
Charles R Thomas
W Warren Suh

Funding

Dr. Salma Jabbour’s NCI Research Specialist (Clinician Scientist) Award (R50)R50CA275877 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Salma Jabbour · 2023 to 2026
$785k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA275877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection are considered standard treatments for early rectal cancer but may be associated with morbidity in selected patients who are candidates for early distal lesions amenable to local excision (LE). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The panel recognizes the importance of accurate staging to identify patients who may be candidates for a LE approach. Patients who may be candidates for LE alone include those with small, low-lying T1 tumors, without adverse pathologic features. Several surgical approaches can be utilized for LE however none include lymph node evaluation. Adjuvant radiation±chemotherapy may be warranted depending on the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with high-risk T1 tumors, T2 tumors not amenable to radical surgery may also benefit from adjuvant treatment; however, patients with positive margins or T3 lesions should be offered abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection. Neoadjuvant radiation±chemotherapy followed by LE in higher risk patients results in excellent local control, but it is not clear if this approach reduces recurrence rates over surgery alone.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantGuidelines as TopicHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoadjuvant TherapyPatient SelectionRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy, ConformalRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26371522
PMCPMC10862362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.