Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26371319›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Geir H Bolstad, Jason A Cassara, Eladio Márquez, Thomas F Hansen, Kim van der Linde, David Houle, Christophe Pélabon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Passage-Dependent Size Distributions of Human-Derived Cells: Implications for Metabolic Assays.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Developmental bias predicts 60 million years of wing shape evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geir H BolstadNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7485 Trondheim, Norway; Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; geir.bolstad@nina.no.
Jason A CassaraDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306;
Eladio MárquezDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306;
Thomas F HansenDepartment of Biology, CEES & EVOGENE, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Kim van der LindeDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306;
David HouleDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306;
Christophe PélabonCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise exponential scaling with size is a fundamental aspect of phenotypic variation. These allometric power laws are often invariant across taxa and have long been hypothesized to reflect developmental constraints. Here we test this hypothesis by investigating the evolutionary potential of an allometric scaling relationship in drosophilid wing shape that is nearly invariant across 111 species separated by at least 50 million years of evolution. In only 26 generations of artificial selection in a population of Drosophila melanogaster, we were able to drive the allometric slope to the outer range of those found among the 111 sampled species. This response was rapidly lost when selection was suspended. Only a small proportion of this reversal could be explained by breakup of linkage disequilibrium, and direct selection on wing shape is also unlikely to explain the reversal, because the more divergent wing shapes produced by selection on the allometric intercept did not revert. We hypothesize that the reversal was instead caused by internal selection arising from pleiotropic links to unknown traits. Our results also suggest that the observed selection response in the allometric slope was due to a component expressed late in larval development and that variation in earlier development did not respond to selection. Together, these results are consistent with a role for pleiotropic constraints in explaining the remarkable evolutionary stability of allometric scaling.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhenotypeSelection, GeneticAnimalsBody SizeDrosophila melanogasterModels, GeneticSelective BreedingWings, Animalallometryartificial selectioncomparative analysesdevelopmental constraintspleiotropy

Identifiers

PMID26371319
PMCPMC4629349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.