Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26371301›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Synthetic dosage lethality in the human metabolic network is highly predictive of tumor growth and cancer patient survival.

Wout Megchelenbrink, Rotem Katzir, Xiaowen Lu, Eytan Ruppin, Richard A Notebaart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification of Genetic Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wout MegchelenbrinkInstitute for Computing and Information Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525 EC Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Centre for Systems Biology and Bioenergetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
Rotem KatzirCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
Xiaowen LuCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
Eytan RuppinCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; School of Computer Science and School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978; ruppin@post.tau.ac.il richard.notebaart@radboudumc.nl.
Richard A NotebaartDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ruppin@post.tau.ac.il richard.notebaart@radboudumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) denotes a genetic interaction between two genes whereby the underexpression of gene A combined with the overexpression of gene B is lethal. SDLs offer a promising way to kill cancer cells by inhibiting the activity of SDL partners of activated oncogenes in tumors, which are often difficult to target directly. As experimental genome-wide SDL screens are still scarce, here we introduce a network-level computational modeling framework that quantitatively predicts human SDLs in metabolism. For each enzyme pair (A, B) we systematically knock out the flux through A combined with a stepwise flux increase through B and search for pairs that reduce cellular growth more than when either enzyme is perturbed individually. The predictive signal of the emerging network of 12,000 SDLs is demonstrated in five different ways. (i) It can be successfully used to predict gene essentiality in shRNA cancer cell line screens. Moving to clinical tumors, we show that (ii) SDLs are significantly underrepresented in tumors. Furthermore, breast cancer tumors with SDLs active (iii) have smaller sizes and (iv) result in increased patient survival, indicating that activation of SDLs increases cancer vulnerability. Finally, (v) patient survival improves when multiple SDLs are present, pointing to a cumulative effect. This study lays the basis for quantitative identification of cancer SDLs in a model-based mechanistic manner. The approach presented can be used to identify SDLs in species and cell types in which "omics" data necessary for data-driven identification are missing.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticComputer SimulationGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, LethalGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysNeoplasmsOncogenesSystems Biologycancergenetic interactionshuman metabolismsynthetic dosage lethalitysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID26371301
PMCPMC4593091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.