Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26371270›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2015

Overcoming challenges in the changing environment of practice-based research.

Stacia A Finch, Richard Wasserman, Emara Nabi-Burza, Bethany Hipple, Robert Oldendick, Jonathan P Winickoff

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stacia A FinchPediatric Research in Office Settings, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois.
Richard WassermanPediatric Research in Office Settings, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Emara Nabi-BurzaCenter for Child and Adolescent Health and Research Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois.
Bethany HippleCenter for Child and Adolescent Health and Research Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois.
Robert OldendickUniversity of South Carolina, Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, Columbia, South Carolina.
Jonathan P WinickoffCenter for Child and Adolescent Health and Research Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois Jwinickoff@mgh.harvard.edu.
American Academy of Pediatrics · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Changing Pediatric Office Systems Nationally to Address Parental Tobacco UseR01CA127127 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WINICKOFF, JONATHAN P · 2007 to 2016
$9.0M
HSRD VA HIR 10-001NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127127NCI NIH HHS R01-CA127127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConducting studies in national practice-based research networks presents logistic and methodologic challenges. Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) has learned valuable lessons in implementing new strategies and adapting to challenges. We describe practical challenges and results of novel applied strategies in implementing and testing the Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure (CEASE) intervention as part of a national-level cluster-randomized controlled trial.

methodsIn the trial, 20 PROS practices were randomized to either a CEASE intervention arm or a control arm. Parents of children seen in the office who indicated smoking in the past 7 days were asked to complete a postvisit enrollment interview and telephone interviews 3 and 12 months later. Identified challenges included (1) recruiting 20 practices serving a high percentage of parent smokers; (2) screening all parents bringing children for visits and enrolling eligible parents who smoked; and (3) achieving an acceptable 12-month telephone response rate.

resultsA total of 47 interested practices completed the Practice Population Survey, of which 20 practices in 16 states completed parent enrollment. Thirty-two research assistants screened 18,607 parents and enrolled 1,980 of them. The initial telephone interview response rate was 56% at 12 months, with incorrect and disconnected numbers accounting for nearly 60% of nonresponses. The response rate rose to 67% after practices supplied 532 new contact numbers and 754 text messages were sent, with 389 parents completing interviews.

conclusionThe strategies we used to overcome methodologic barriers in conducting a national intervention trial allowed data collection to be completed in the office setting and increased the telephone interview response rate.

Indexed as

ParentsSmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultCommunicationData CollectionEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMalePediatricsPrimary Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsTelephoneTobacco Smoke PollutionUnited StatesTobacco Smoke Pollutioncommunicationfollow-upmethodologypediatricspractice-based researchprimary careresponse ratesecondhand smoketrial design

Identifiers

PMID26371270
PMCPMC4569457
OpenAlexW2119761054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.