Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26371145›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2015

Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: A 29-Year Longitudinal Experience Evaluating Clinicopathologic Features and Breast Cancer Risk.

Tari A King, Melissa Pilewskie, Shirin Muhsen, Sujata Patil, Starr K Mautner, Anna Park, Sabine Oskar, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Camilla Boafo, Jessica C Gooch and 6 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 199 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Outcomes of Lobular CarcinomaJournal of breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  11. Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Associated with Outcomes after In Situ Breast Disease.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tari A KingAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. tking7@partners.org.
Melissa PilewskieAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Shirin MuhsenAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sujata PatilAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Starr K MautnerAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Anna ParkAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sabine OskarAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Elena Guerini-RoccoAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Camilla BoafoAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Jessica C GoochAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Marina De BrotAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Jorge S Reis-FilhoAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Mary MorroghAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Victor P AndradeAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Rita A SakrAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Monica MorrowAll authors: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe increased breast cancer risk conferred by a diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is poorly understood. Here, we review our 29-year longitudinal experience with LCIS to evaluate factors associated with breast cancer risk. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients participating in surveillance after an LCIS diagnosis are observed in a prospectively maintained database. Comparisons were made among women choosing surveillance, with or without chemoprevention, and those undergoing bilateral prophylactic mastectomies between 1980 and 2009.

resultsOne thousand sixty patients with LCIS without concurrent breast cancer were identified. Median age at LCIS diagnosis was 50 years (range, 27 to 83 years). Fifty-six patients (5%) underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy; 1,004 chose surveillance with (n = 173) or without (n = 831) chemoprevention. At a median follow-up of 81 months (range, 6 to 368 months), 150 patients developed 168 breast cancers (63% ipsilateral, 25% contralateral, 12% bilateral), with no dominant histology (ductal carcinoma in situ, 35%; infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 29%; infiltrating lobular carcinoma, 27%; other, 9%). Breast cancer incidence was significantly reduced in women taking chemoprevention (10-year cumulative risk: 7% with chemoprevention; 21% with no chemoprevention; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, chemoprevention was the only clinical factor associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.50). In a subgroup nested case-control analysis, volume of disease, which was defined as the ratio of slides with LCIS to total number of slides reviewed, was also associated with breast cancer development (P = .008).

conclusionWe observed a 2% annual incidence of breast cancer among women with LCIS. Common clinical factors used for risk prediction, including age and family history, were not associated with breast cancer risk. The lower breast cancer incidence in women opting for chemoprevention highlights the potential for risk reduction in this population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCancer Care FacilitiesCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, LobularCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLongitudinal StudiesTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID26371145
PMCPMC4934644
OpenAlexW1940799857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.