ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2015
Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: A 29-Year Longitudinal Experience Evaluating Clinicopathologic Features and Breast Cancer Risk.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 199 citations in OpenAlex.
- Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines.The Lancet. Oncology · 2020Guideline
- Evaluation of exogenous estrogen use in patients with lobular neoplasia and its role in subsequent breast cancer development.Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Reply to "Beyond Uptake Aligning Low-Dose Tamoxifen Adherence with Absolute Breast Cancer Risk," by Hu, Zhiping et al.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Integrating multi-omics and clinical management in breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Adherence to Endocrine Prevention in Patients with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Promising Trends from Real-World Use of Low-Dose Tamoxifen.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Lobular CarcinomaJournal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- The Changing Landscape of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Associated with Outcomes after In Situ Breast Disease.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Immediate and ipsilateral recurrence rates and treatment recommendations for patients with pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Recent strategies in diagnosis, screening, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer in young women.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- TGF-β Signaling in Cancer: Mechanisms of Progression and Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Navigating the Uncertainty of B3 Breast Lesions: Diagnostic Challenges and Evolving Management Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Subsequent percutaneous breast biopsies after initial atypia diagnosis: The patient burden of long-term follow up.American journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Florid Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Imaging Characteristics and Pathologic Upgrade Rates on Surgical Excision.The breast journal · 2025Article
- Assessing Malignant Risk in B3 Breast Lesions: Clinical Insights and Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe increased breast cancer risk conferred by a diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is poorly understood. Here, we review our 29-year longitudinal experience with LCIS to evaluate factors associated with breast cancer risk. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients participating in surveillance after an LCIS diagnosis are observed in a prospectively maintained database. Comparisons were made among women choosing surveillance, with or without chemoprevention, and those undergoing bilateral prophylactic mastectomies between 1980 and 2009.
resultsOne thousand sixty patients with LCIS without concurrent breast cancer were identified. Median age at LCIS diagnosis was 50 years (range, 27 to 83 years). Fifty-six patients (5%) underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy; 1,004 chose surveillance with (n = 173) or without (n = 831) chemoprevention. At a median follow-up of 81 months (range, 6 to 368 months), 150 patients developed 168 breast cancers (63% ipsilateral, 25% contralateral, 12% bilateral), with no dominant histology (ductal carcinoma in situ, 35%; infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 29%; infiltrating lobular carcinoma, 27%; other, 9%). Breast cancer incidence was significantly reduced in women taking chemoprevention (10-year cumulative risk: 7% with chemoprevention; 21% with no chemoprevention; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, chemoprevention was the only clinical factor associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.50). In a subgroup nested case-control analysis, volume of disease, which was defined as the ratio of slides with LCIS to total number of slides reviewed, was also associated with breast cancer development (P = .008).
conclusionWe observed a 2% annual incidence of breast cancer among women with LCIS. Common clinical factors used for risk prediction, including age and family history, were not associated with breast cancer risk. The lower breast cancer incidence in women opting for chemoprevention highlights the potential for risk reduction in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.