Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26370560›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary and alternative medicine2015

Standardized minimal acupuncture, individualized acupuncture, and no acupuncture for infantile colic: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial - ACU-COL.

Kajsa Landgren, Iren Tiberg, Inger Hallström

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01761331 (Acupuncture in Infantile Colic - a Three Armed Randomized Multi Center Trial Comparing Acupuncture in a Standardized Point, Acupuncture in Individually Chosen Points and no Acupuncture), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01761331 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Acupuncture in Infantile Colic - a Three Armed Randomized Multi Center Trial Comparing Acupuncture in a Standardized Point, Acupuncture in Individually Chosen Points and no Acupuncture

TypeinterventionalSponsorLund UniversityRan2013 to 2015Enrolled147ConditionsInfantile ColicArmsAcupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kajsa LandgrenDepartment of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden. kajsa.landgren@med.lu.se.
Iren TibergDepartment of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden. iren.tiberg@med.lu.se.
Inger HallströmDepartment of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden. inger.hallstrom@med.lu.se.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite weak evidence, the use of acupuncture has increased in infantile colic. The only three randomized trials conducted evaluated standardized minimal acupuncture in one single point. Two showed effect but one did not so further research is necessary. The aims of the study are 1) to test if results in earlier trials conducted in private acupuncture clinics can be repeated at Child Health Centers (CHC) and 2) to compare the effect of two types of acupuncture and no acupuncture in infants with colic at CHC. METHODS/

designa multicenter randomized controlled three-armed trial for infantile colic conducted in four regions of Sweden. Alongside the standard program at their regular Child Health Center infants visit a study center twice a week for 2 weeks. The infants are randomly allocated into three groups. According to the power analysis, 144 otherwise healthy infants aged 2-9 weeks old, who - according to parents' registration in a diary - are crying and/or fussing more than three hours per day, more than 3 days per week will be included. Parents register daily in the diary during the baseline week, two intervention weeks, and one more week directly after the last study visit. At four study visits at the Child Health Center parents meet a nurse for 20-30 min to receive advice and support. The nurse and the parents are blinded for group allocation. Infants are carried to another room, where they spend five minutes with an acupuncturist. Infants randomized to group A receive standardized minimal acupuncture in LI4. Group B receive individualized acupuncture where, according to symptoms, the acupuncturist can choose between the points Sifeng, LI4, and ST36. Group C receives no acupuncture. The primary outcome is relative difference in crying, counted in minutes. Secondary outcomes are number of infants fulfilling the criteria for colic, and changes in sleep and stooling frequency. Adverse events and blinding are recorded. Recruitment started in January 2013. During the first 14 months 93 patients were included. Data collection continues until May 2015. No interim analyses have been conducted. DISCUSSION: The study will provide information about the efficacy and safety of acupuncture as a complement to usual care in infants with colic.

trial registrationDecember 29, 2012: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01761331.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyColicHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSweden

Identifiers

PMID26370560
PMCPMC4570710
OpenAlexW1936459055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.