Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26370518›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

V1 neurons respond differently to object motion versus motion from eye movements.

Xoana G Troncoso, Michael B McCamy, Ali Najafian Jazi, Jie Cui, Jorge Otero-Millan, Stephen L Macknik, Francisco M Costela, Susana Martinez-Conde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Learning to silence saccadic suppression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Modulations of foveal vision associated with microsaccade preparation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Predictive Sensing: The Role of Motor Signals in Sensory Processing.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2019
    Review
  11. Directing Voluntary Temporal Attention Increases Fixational Stability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xoana G TroncosoBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Michael B McCamyBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Ali Najafian JaziBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Jie CuiBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Jorge Otero-MillanBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Stephen L MacknikBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Francisco M CostelaBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Susana Martinez-CondeBarrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Barrow Neurological Institute · USPhoenix Children's Hospital · USArizona State University · USInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the visual system differentiate self-generated motion from motion in the external world? Humans can discern object motion from identical retinal image displacements induced by eye movements, but the brain mechanisms underlying this ability are unknown. Here we exploit the frequent production of microsaccades during ocular fixation in the primate to compare primary visual cortical responses to self-generated motion (real microsaccades) versus motion in the external world (object motion mimicking microsaccades). Real and simulated microsaccades were randomly interleaved in the same viewing condition, thereby producing equivalent oculomotor and behavioural engagement. Our results show that real microsaccades generate biphasic neural responses, consisting of a rapid increase in the firing rate followed by a slow and smaller-amplitude suppression that drops below baseline. Simulated microsaccades generate solely excitatory responses. These findings indicate that V1 neurons can respond differently to internally and externally generated motion, and expand V1's potential role in information processing and visual stability during eye movements.

Identifiers

PMID26370518
PMCPMC4579399
OpenAlexW2264862075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.