Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26370414›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Cord pilot trial: update to randomised trial protocol.

Lucy E Bradshaw, Angela Pushpa-Rajah, Jon Dorling, Eleanor J Mitchell, Lelia Duley, Cord Pilot Trial Collaborative Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Randomised trial of cord clamping at very preterm birth: outcomes at 2 years.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Randomised trial of cord clamping and initial stabilisation at very preterm birth.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2018
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucy E BradshawNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. lucy.bradshaw@nottingham.ac.uk.
Angela Pushpa-RajahNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. angela.pushpa-rajah@nottingham.ac.uk.
Jon DorlingNeonatal Unit, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. jon.dorling@nottingham.ac.uk.
Eleanor J MitchellNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. Eleanor.mitchell@nottingham.ac.uk.
Lelia DuleyNottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. lelia.duley@nottingham.ac.uk.
Cord Pilot Trial Collaborative Group

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cord Pilot Trial aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a large UK randomised trial to compare the effects of alternative polices for timing of cord clamping (immediate within 20 seconds or deferred after at least 2 minutes) for very preterm birth before 32 weeks gestation. Initial recruitment was from March 2013 to February 2014, phase 2 was from March 2014 to February 2015. This paper updates the pilot trial protocol (Trials 15(1):258, 2014) and presents the changes for phase 2.

methodsAn electronic randomisation system was introduced at three of the eight pilot sites. For follow-up of children, the Parent Report of Children's Abilities--Revised (PARCA-R) will not be used. For children recruited to the trial during phase 2, follow-up at age 2 years (corrected for gestation at birth) will be by parent completed Ages and Stages Questionnaire (Squire J, Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ), 2009) alone unless funds can be secured for the additional Bayley Scales of Infant Development III (Bayley N, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. (Bayley-III), 2005) assessments. To assess accuracy of the cranial ultrasound diagnosis of intraventricular haemorrhage: (i) quality of the scans will be assessed using the British Society of Paediatric Radiology recommendations, and (ii) scan results will be confirmed by independent adjudication. Within and between adjudicator reliability will be assessed. In addition to the analyses planned to assess feasibility of the full trial based on data from the first year of recruitment, data on compliance and outcomes will be presented by allocated group for all women and babies recruited.

trial registrationISRCTN21456601, registered on 28 February 2013.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematurePremature BirthAge FactorsChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsConstrictionFeasibility StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntracranial HemorrhagesPilot ProjectsPregnancyResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID26370414
PMCPMC4570047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.