Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26370412›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Development and validation of an epitope prediction tool for swine (PigMatrix) based on the pocket profile method.

Andres H Gutiérrez, William D Martin, Chris Bailey-Kellogg, Frances Terry, Leonard Moise, Anne S De Groot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immunopeptidomics ofBiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Swine influenza A virus: challenges and novel vaccine strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andres H GutiérrezInstitute for Immunology and Informatics, CMB/CELS, University of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. anunez.uri@gmail.com.
William D MartinEpiVax, Inc., Providence, RI, 02860, USA. martinb@epivax.com.
Chris Bailey-KelloggDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. cbk@cs.dartmouth.edu.
Frances TerryEpiVax, Inc., Providence, RI, 02860, USA. fterry@epivax.com.
Leonard MoiseInstitute for Immunology and Informatics, CMB/CELS, University of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. lmoise@epivax.com.
Anne S De GrootInstitute for Immunology and Informatics, CMB/CELS, University of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. dr.annie.degroot@gmail.com.
EpiVax (United States) · USDartmouth College · USProvidence College · USUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundT cell epitope prediction tools and associated vaccine design algorithms have accelerated the development of vaccines for humans. Predictive tools for swine and other food animals are not as well developed, primarily because the data required to develop the tools are lacking. Here, we overcome a lack of T cell epitope data to construct swine epitope predictors by systematically leveraging available human information. Applying the "pocket profile method", we use sequence and structural similarities in the binding pockets of human and swine major histocompatibility complex proteins to infer Swine Leukocyte Antigen (SLA) peptide binding preferences. We developed epitope-prediction matrices (PigMatrices), for three SLA class I alleles (SLA-1*0401, 2*0401 and 3*0401) and one class II allele (SLA-DRB1*0201), based on the binding preferences of the best-matched Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) pocket for each SLA pocket. The contact residues involved in the binding pockets were defined for class I based on crystal structures of either SLA (SLA-specific contacts, Ssc) or HLA supertype alleles (HLA contacts, Hc); for class II, only Hc was possible. Different substitution matrices were evaluated (PAM and BLOSUM) for scoring pocket similarity and identifying the best human match. The accuracy of the PigMatrices was compared to available online swine epitope prediction tools such as PickPocket and NetMHCpan.

resultsPigMatrices that used Ssc to define the pocket sequences and PAM30 to score pocket similarity demonstrated the best predictive performance and were able to accurately separate binders from random peptides. For SLA-1*0401 and 2*0401, PigMatrix achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.78 and 0.73, respectively, which were equivalent or better than PickPocket (0.76 and 0.54) and NetMHCpan version 2.4 (0.41 and 0.51) and version 2.8 (0.72 and 0.71). In addition, we developed the first predictive SLA class II matrix, obtaining an AUC of 0.73 for existing SLA-DRB1*0201 epitopes. Notably, PigMatrix achieved this level of predictive power without training on SLA binding data.

conclusionOverall, the pocket profile method combined with binding preferences from HLA binding data shows significant promise for developing T cell epitope prediction tools for pigs. When combined with existing vaccine design algorithms, PigMatrix will be useful for developing genome-derived vaccines for a range of pig pathogens for which no effective vaccines currently exist (e.g. porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, influenza and porcine epidemic diarrhea).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalAllelesAnimalsCatalytic DomainComputational BiologyEpitope MappingEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansMolecular Docking SimulationPeptide FragmentsProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Structure, TertiaryEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIPeptide Fragmentsswine leukocyte antigenVaccines

Identifiers

PMID26370412
PMCPMC4570239
OpenAlexW1824017900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.