Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26370239›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2015

Computed tomography perfusion-based thrombolysis in wake-up stroke.

Nicola Morelli, Eugenia Rota, Paolo Immovilli, Mirco Cosottini, Matteo Giorgi-Pierfranceschi, Andrea Magnacavallo, Emanuele Michieletti, John Morelli, Donata Guidetti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Wake-up stroke and CT perfusion: effectiveness and safety of reperfusion therapy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Is CT perfusion helpful in the treatment allocation of patients with acute ischemic stroke? An expert-opinion analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola MorelliNeurology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121, Piacenza, Italy. nicola.morelli.md@gmail.com.
Eugenia RotaNeurology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121, Piacenza, Italy.
Paolo ImmovilliNeurology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121, Piacenza, Italy.
Mirco CosottiniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Matteo Giorgi-PierfranceschiEmergency Department, Hospital of Val d'Arda, Piacenza, Italy.
Andrea MagnacavalloEmergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
Emanuele MichielettiRadiology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
John MorelliRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Donata GuidettiNeurology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121, Piacenza, Italy.
Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital · ITJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wake-up stroke (WUS) patients are typically excluded from reperfusion treatment, as the time of symptoms onset is unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA in patients with WUS eligible for therapy using computed tomography perfusion criteria (CTP), compared to patients treated with rt-PA within 4.5 h of symptoms onset (non-WUS). This is an experimental, open-label trial, controlled against the best therapy currently in use. Primary endpoints were functional independence after 3 months [modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 1] for clinical outcome and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) for safety. Secondary endpoints were no or only mild disability after 3 months (mRS ≤ 2) for clinical outcome, total intracerebral hemorrhage (TICH) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) for safety. 170 patients were treated, 143 non-WUS patients and 27 patients with WUS. Strokes of cardioembolic origin were most common in WUS patients (p < 0.001). Primary endpoints: mRS ≤ 1 was found in 35.8 % (non-WUS: 36.4% vs. WUS 33.3%; p = 0.62) and SICH was observed in 3.4 % of non-WUS patients and in WUS patients (p = 0.32). Secondary endpoints: mRS ≤ 2 was observed in 66.4 % of patients (non-WUS: 67.1% vs. WUS 62.9%; p = 0.67), TICH in 13.5 % of patients (13.9 % non-WUS vs. 11.1 % WUS; p = 0.69). CIN was documented in 3.7 % of WUS patients. rt-PA treatment carried out in WUS patients selected on the basis of CTP data demonstrate comparable clinical outcome and safety with respect to non-WUS patients. The study supports the hypothesis that a selected group of WUS patients may be suitable for thrombolysis.

Indexed as

Thrombolytic TherapyAgedBrainDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesMalePatient SelectionPerfusionPilot ProjectsStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorTomography, Spiral ComputedTissue Plasminogen ActivatorCT perfusionPenumbraWake-up stroke

Identifiers

PMID26370239
OpenAlexW2181101160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.