Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26370227›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Comparative genomics between human and animal associated subspecies of the Mycobacterium avium complex: a basis for pathogenicity.

Verlaine J Timms, Karl A Hassan, Hazel M Mitchell, Brett A Neilan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Genomic epidemiology ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of essential genes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary genomic and bacteria GWAS analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Involvement ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Comparative Genomics ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  10. Complete Genome Sequence of OvineMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genotyping methods and molecular epidemiology ofInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Verlaine J TimmsSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia. verlaine.timms@unswalumni.com.
Karl A HassanDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. karl.hassan@mq.edu.au.
Hazel M MitchellSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia. h.mitchell@unsw.edu.au.
Brett A NeilanSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia. b.neilan@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUMacquarie University · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA human isolate of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (M. paratuberculosis 43525) was sequenced and compared genomically to other mycobacterial pathogens. M. paratuberculosis 43525 was recently isolated from a patient with ulcerative colitis and belongs to the M. avium complex, a group known to infect both humans and animals. While M. paratuberculosis is a known pathogen of livestock, there are only 20 human isolates from the last 20 years, therefore we took the opportunity to perform a whole genome comparison between human and animal mycobacterial pathogens. We also compared virulence determinants such as the mycobactin cluster, PE/PPE genes and mammalian cell entry (mce) operons between MAC subspecies that infect animals and those that infect humans. M. tuberculosis was also included in these analyses given its predominant role as a human pathogen.

resultsThis genome comparison showed the PE/PPE profile of M. paratuberculosis 43525 to be largely the same as other M. paratuberculosis isolates, except that it had one PPE and one PE_PGRS protein that are only present in human MAC strains and M. tuberculosis. PE/PPE proteins that were unique to M. paratuberculosis 43525, M. avium subsp. hominissuis and a caprine M. paratuberculosis isolate, were also identified. In addition, the mycobactin cluster differed between human and animal isolates and a unique mce operon flanked by two mycobactin genes, mbtA and mbtJ, was identified in all available M. paratuberculosis genomes.

conclusionsDespite the whole genome comparison placing M. paratuberculosis 43525 as closely related to bovine M. paratuberculosis, key virulence factors were similar to human mycobacterial pathogens. This study highlights key factors of mycobacterial pathogenesis in humans and forms the basis for future functional studies.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsBase CompositionChromosomes, BacterialCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGene OrderGenes, BacterialGenome, BacterialHumansMultigene FamilyMycobacterium avium ComplexMycobacterium avium-intracellulare InfectionOpen Reading FramesOperonOxazolesmycobactinsOxazolesVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID26370227
PMCPMC4570654
OpenAlexW1946869902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.