ArticleBiology open2015
Eating locally: Australasian gannets increase their foraging effort in a restricted range.
Article in Biology open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining energy expenditure in a large seabird using accelerometry.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- Geographical, temporal, and individual-based differences in the trophic ecology of female Cape fur seals.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Quantifying inter-annual variability on the space-use of parental Northern Gannets (Morus bassanus) in pursuit of different prey types.PloS one · 2023Article
- An evaluation of machine learning classifiers for next-generation, continuous-ethogram smart trackers.Movement ecology · 2021Article
- Article
- Oceanic thermal structure mediates dive sequences in a foraging seabird.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Geographical, temporal and individual factors influencing foraging behaviour and consistency in Australasian gannets.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Factors influencing prey capture success and profitability in Australasian gannets (Biology open · 2020Article
- Proximity of breeding and foraging areas affects foraging effort of a crepuscular, insectivorous bird.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Understanding meta-population trends of the Australian fur seal, with insights for adaptive monitoring.PloS one · 2018Article
- Validating accelerometry estimates of energy expenditure across behaviours using heart rate data in a free-living seabird.The Journal of experimental biology · 2017Article
- Habitat-specific foraging strategies in Australasian gannets.Biology open · 2016Article
- Changes in behaviour drive inter-annual variability in the at-sea distribution of northern gannets.Marine biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the breeding season, seabirds adopt a central place foraging strategy and are restricted in their foraging range by the fasting ability of their partner/chick and the cost of commuting between the prey resources and the nest. Because of the spatial and temporal variability of marine ecosystems, individuals must adapt their behaviour to increase foraging success within these constraints. The at-sea movements, foraging behaviour and effort of the Australasian gannet (Morus serrator) was determined over three sequential breeding seasons of apparent differing prey abundance to investigate how the species adapts to inter-annual fluctuations in food availability. GPS and tri-axial accelerometer data loggers were used to compare the degree of annual variation within two stages of breeding (incubation and chick rearing) at a small gannet colony situated between two larger, nearby colonies. Interestingly, neither males nor females increased the total distance travelled or duration of foraging trip in any breeding stage (P>0.05 in all cases) despite apparent low prey availability. However, consistently within each breeding stage, mean vectorial dynamic body acceleration (an index of energy expenditure) was greater in years of poorer breeding success (increased by a factor of three to eight), suggesting birds were working harder within their range. Additionally, both males and females increased the proportion of a foraging trip spent foraging in a poorer year across both breeding stages. Individuals from this colony may be limited in their ability to extend their range in years of low prey availability due to competition from conspecifics in nearby colonies and, consequently, increase foraging effort within this restricted foraging area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.