Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369924›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2016

Inhibiting prepotent responses in the elderly: Distraction and disinhibition.

Shulan Hsieh, Mengyao Wu, Chien-Hui Tang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Food Inhibitory Control and Reward Responsiveness in Healthy Aging.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shulan HsiehCognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory: Control, Aging, Sleep, & Emotion (CASE), Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan. psyhsl@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Mengyao WuCognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory: Control, Aging, Sleep, & Emotion (CASE), Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Chien-Hui TangCognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory: Control, Aging, Sleep, & Emotion (CASE), Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
National Cheng Kung University · TWMin-Hwei College of Health Care Management · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to examine whether older adults, relative to younger adults, suffer from generic inhibition, selective inhibition, and/or distraction deficits, as assessed by behavioral and electrophysiological measures in a go/no-go task paradigm that included manipulations of no-go stimulus type (irrelevant vs. conflict) and no-go probability. A total of 96 individuals were recruited; each of three experiments included 32 participants (16 adults above and 16 adults below 60 years of age). The older adults performed more poorly than the younger adults in our behavioral test; however, the event-related potential results showed that irrelevant and conflict no-go stimuli incurred different processes that were differentially impacted by aging, as was reflected in the N2 and P3. That is, the older adults' inhibition deficits might be due to different underlying mechanisms: disproportionate processing of irrelevant no-go stimuli, and disproportionate suppression of conflicting information when executing or withholding a response to conflict no-go stimuli. The present results therefore support the theories of age-related selective inhibition and distraction deficits.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBehaviorElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung AdultAgingDistractionInhibitionNo-go probability

Identifiers

PMID26369924
OpenAlexW2239242582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.