ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2016
Plant artificial chromosome technology and its potential application in genetic engineering.
Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- B chromosomes put the 'super' in supernumerary.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- Chloroplast Genome Engineering: A Plausible Approach to Combat Chili Thrips and Other Agronomic Insect Pests of Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial chromosome technology and its potential application in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Editorial: Recent advances in plant genetic engineering and innovative applications.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Review
- Particle bombardment technology and its applications in plants.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Insights Into Genetic and Molecular Elements for Transgenic Crop Development.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Genetic Modification for Wheat Improvement: From Transgenesis to Genome Editing.BioMed research international · 2019Review
- Transcriptome profiling of transgenic potato plants provides insights into variability caused by plant transformation.PloS one · 2018Article
- Novel technologies in doubled haploid line development.Plant biotechnology journal · 2017Review
- Diatom centromeres suggest a mechanism for nuclear DNA acquisition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic engineering with just a few genes has changed agriculture in the last 20 years. The most frequently used transgenes are the herbicide resistance genes for efficient weed control and the Bt toxin genes for insect resistance. The adoption of the first-generation genetically engineered crops has been very successful in improving farming practices, reducing the application of pesticides that are harmful to both human health and the environment, and producing more profit for farmers. However, there is more potential for genetic engineering to be realized by technical advances. The recent development of plant artificial chromosome technology provides a super vector platform, which allows the management of a large number of genes for the next generation of genetic engineering. With the development of other tools such as gene assembly, genome editing, gene targeting and chromosome delivery systems, it should become possible to engineer crops with multiple genes to produce more agricultural products with less input of natural resources to meet future demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.