ReviewBMJ quality & safety2016
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework.
Review in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development and Validation of SafeHIT: An Instrument to Assess the Self-Reported Safe Use of Health Information Technology.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Pooled it
- The impact of health information technology on the management and follow-up of test results - a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Are We There Yet? Human Factors Knowledge and Health Information Technology - the Challenges of Implementation and Impact.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- Human factors methods for designing safe health information technology: what do the experts think?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Effects of electronic health records implementation on workflow and health care provider outcomes: a prospective, multi-professional cohort study.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Understanding the Limits of Patient Safety Classification Systems for Health Information Technology-Related Incidents.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Socio-Technical Mechanisms Shaping AI Scribe Documentation Failures: A Netnographic Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Health Information Technology-Related Loss of Central Surveillance Data in a Heart Intensive Care Unit: Multi-Framework Case Report.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Disposition at Equipoise: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Physicians' Decision-Making About Hospitalizing People With Dementia.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- From bedside to bytes: the digital transformation of the healthcare workforce.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- A qualitative, multi-framework methodology for analysing health information technology-related patient safety incidents.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Normalization of Risk in Primary Care: Revealing Latent Safety Threats Through Simple Digital Monitoring in Family Medicine.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Why digital health fails silently: a sociotechnical theory of health information technology-related risk.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- From emergence to recoverability: a sociotechnical control trajectory theory of HIT-related risk.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Using human centred design and human factors to support a rapid health information technology patient safety response.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Bridging Global Frameworks and Local Practice: Quantitative Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Safety in Kuwait's Public Hospitals.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Improving Alarm Management Practices: Wireless Bed Exit Alerts on Medical-Surgical Units.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2025Article
- Patient, Examination, and System Factors Associated with Completed Follow-up for Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Breast Findings in a Large, Complex Health Care System.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- Connected Healthcare System Technology Interventions to Improve Patient Safety by Reducing Medical Errors: A Systematic Review.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2025Review
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health information technology (health IT) has potential to improve patient safety but its implementation and use has led to unintended consequences and new safety concerns. A key challenge to improving safety in health IT-enabled healthcare systems is to develop valid, feasible strategies to measure safety concerns at the intersection of health IT and patient safety. In response to the fundamental conceptual and methodological gaps related to both defining and measuring health IT-related patient safety, we propose a new framework, the Health IT Safety (HITS) measurement framework, to provide a conceptual foundation for health IT-related patient safety measurement, monitoring, and improvement. The HITS framework follows both Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and sociotechnical approaches and calls for new measures and measurement activities to address safety concerns in three related domains: 1) concerns that are unique and specific to technology (e.g., to address unsafe health IT related to unavailable or malfunctioning hardware or software); 2) concerns created by the failure to use health IT appropriately or by misuse of health IT (e.g. to reduce nuisance alerts in the electronic health record (EHR)), and 3) the use of health IT to monitor risks, health care processes and outcomes and identify potential safety concerns before they can harm patients (e.g. use EHR-based algorithms to identify patients at risk for medication errors or care delays). The framework proposes to integrate both retrospective and prospective measurement of HIT safety with an organization's existing clinical risk management and safety programs. It aims to facilitate organizational learning, comprehensive 360 degree assessment of HIT safety that includes vendor involvement, refinement of measurement tools and strategies, and shared responsibility to identify problems and implement solutions. A long term framework goal is to enable rigorous measurement that helps achieve the safety benefits of health IT in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.